In a thread about raiding being meta for 5 mans is, indeed, unrelated.
No. You mentioned druids. I said druids did not have a good representation in raids. (You more or less only have 2 (at most 3) And that a bad feral is worse than a bad ret. Then i asked how your meta class was going, because you used to brag about playing a meta class back when the servers opened but now you are everywhere crying about how bad ret is.
I made a paraphrased joke making light of the response ret paladins got when someone complained that ret is easier than feral.
You made a stupid deal out of it. As usual.
edit:
Even the guy I responded to got that, why can’t you?
Ret IS easier than feral. Feral is considered the hardest spec to play in wrath of the lich king right now. And a bad feral is below bad rets in damage, a good feral is above a good ret in damage. And rets are considered one of the easiest specs to play right now.
You are just not understanding anything people tell you.
My comment was in reality an answer about reepresentation in raids.
Have I ever, at any point, indicated otherwise?
No, but that is the point you decided to argue about.
For some strange reason.
Because you brought it up?
sigh
I dont even.
Oh I know this, trust me, I know this.
Sorry boss, I was just memeing, but it looks like I set you up, lmao.
It’s cool, Nikky is just… well, let me put it in his words.
I don’t even
I wonder what arguments you are going to bring to the table when Retri will still be complete trash in ICC because of the toolkit.
Retri was top tier on live back then. Only in the beginnign of Ulduar and of TOC it dropped to the low A tier.
THe utility and not running oom are not valid reasons to bring a spec that provides less dps than a hunter pet. All of the auras or buffs can be provided by other Paladin specs which perform crazily well or by other classes that can provide at least 50% extra dps.
Wrong and doesn’t do less damage than a hunter pet just get good.
repeat the first grade, or whereever you have learned to read.
Check the logs after that.
Just because you’re a bot with a 91% overall doesn’t mean the class sucks. Learn to read a guide and check logs after that.
So what does it mean when a pink/orange parsing ret does less damage than a green dk parse?
Why just blatantly lie?
So, I’ve seen a strong paladin on Firemaw:
classic.warcraftlogs. com/character/id/69163542?mode=detailed&zone=1015#metric=dps
Here’s a purple parsing dk I was in a pug with a while ago:
classic.warcraftlogs. com/character/id/68855116?mode=detailed&zone=1015#metric=dps
None of the dks purple parses (as dks strongest spec) are better than the paladins pink parses?
At what point do you stop just lying to make your point seem valid? Just stop being bad.
Huge lie. The DK got carried. You should have mentioned the DK has the setup of his warcraft logs to show the ilvl% parses not the overall ones. His actual overall parses are around 60, best case scenario.
His parses are what they are. His dps reflects his parse. How greatly do you two want to clown yourself? Clueless.
As yo usaid his parses are what they are.
At least have the dignity to set your page show overall parses not the ilvl%.
How much do you try to prove your point by lying?