Why can’t they give it a shred of nuance?? Like some kul tirans going “Hmm maybe the drust did have a right to defend their homeland when we invaded it”, and there being consequence to the fact they live on stolen land in the form of acknowledgment as opposed to “oh no the spirits of these victims of genocide are haunting us!! better wipe them out in death too!!”
It’s just a disgustingly colonialist narrative and I’m sorry for my sjw rants but ugh
Blizzard storytelling is, by its nature, extremely black and white. The only time shades of grey ever exist is to beat us over the head with the same tired conclusion as always.
Still, the actual narrative from the Drust’s own carvings is that them massacring unarmed farmers was a good thing, which is pretty… Uh… Well, awful. Stay tuned for the next instalment, when we get a story about how Gallywix was right to displace thousand of Tauren because he wanted to drill for oil.
HD ram without any armour. I wonder if this means they’ll be giving updated versions of the other classic mounts. https://wow.zamimg.com/uploads/screenshots/normal/920200.jpg