The problem with Alliance bias

What the actual…wow… Yeah…that…that is next level of madness.

By the way, notice that everyone, posting on Horde or Alliance are kind of giving the same vibe, which is that you are chatting whiff.

Are you alright? Do we need to call someone?

Well that -is- what you will get when the people designing the places keep going “We need to make Horde cities look more like a BDSM Dungeon!” “What about like, this shining city they had?” “When was that?” “TBC?” “When was that?” “Are you kidding me! We just re-released it for the pre-teen market!” “Does it look good?” “No, it looks awful, it’s still on the Outlands Maps!” “Why?” “I Don’t know, I’m just an intern!” “Fine, does it look better than Undercity?”
“Everything looks better than Undercity.”
“We’re Gucci then.”

The Phrase “Out of the frying pan and into the fire” springs to mind…

I think you might want to revisit that statement. Last I checked, their High King is kinda…not doing so good?

Apart from the Amani. Who are actually still hostile to the Zandalari. In the Zandalari’s Capital City. No. Don’t ask me how this makes sense, and why the Zandalari have not just wiped them out. The Amani are basically the Scarlet Crusade of the Horde. Everyone with a brain knows they are dead and dust, yet they keep getting resuscitated, just to get smashed into a sticky pulp every few expansions.

2 Likes

one answer to the OP

we have jaina.
the worst character in wow history. The single worst leader in the entirety of wow.
The worst character the game has ever spawned .
AND SHES STILL HERE.

blizzard hate alliance, as proven by jainas existence.

3 Likes

The High King doesnt have as much power as the Warchief did. As visible with someone like tyrande telling the “high king” to shove it. The High King is more in line with beings like the german chancellor while the Warchief is more in line with the leader of NK.

Disobey the High King? Well, thats not treason automatically. Depending on your reasons.

Disobey the Warchief? Ye mate, thats high treason regardless whether youre right or wrong. Up to the chopping block ya go.

The tribes opposed to the Horde caused quite some ruckus when Talanji and Rastakhan gave the Horde their embassy n stuff. So no, they couldnt care less. Also the Amani are not on friendly terms with the Zandalari.

1 Like

You’re welcome.

Yes.

I don’t.

They can do better with the right guidance.

I disagree, because I genuinely like the Horde.

Those 4 points are entirely driven by personal preference.

Subjective and hard to prove.

Not really sure what this is getting at. I don’t believe it to be correct.
Certainly no more relevant zones.

Horde is SAVAGE. Go back to ally you pathetic blood elf

Look here.

Jaina was everywhere in bfa.

No. Look at WoD for example. Draenei stuff went through the roof.

I don’t. I want the Horde to make a heelturn.

its good to see the fight against the alliance bias is still going on.

1 Like

Vulperas and goblins are worse. xD

This only shows your bias in not understanding basic concepts like Order and Chaos. We live in a culture in which Order is equivocated with Good and Chaos with Evil. This is why The Horde are seen as “the bad guys” when they’re merely chaotic.

Making the Horde more civilized will kill the core conflict between them and the Alliance. That of Order versus Chaos.

To be fair, Blizz for the longest time had some bias in the favor of Order, but now they’re realizing both forces simply exist and are completely amoral. So we’ll get some decent villains of Order, starting of course, with The Light. There will be many villains to rise from the Alliance, do not worry.

The Alliance doesn’t have better zones, because if I got to be fair… their leveling makes me quit the game. We all have memories of The Barrens. Not of the Alliance zones. The Barrens is WoW’s most famous zone ever, mainly because… it made you, the player its center. Mainly because there wasn’t much else to it. The Alliance zones are… completely boring and void of creativity.

This ^

I agree that the Horde got “shafted” with certain things, namely the fact that all of our leaders eventually die or turn evil and how much its butt got handed to them by the Alliance during the Fourth Way (lorewise), but besides that the Horde and the Alliance are pretty equal in terms of aesthetics.

The only “bias” is here is the bias toward Erevien and why he isn’t banned parmanently?
End the Erevien bias!!!
#EndItNow
By the way Erevian, you left us, remember?
Your exile awaits…

1 Like

Sylvanas redemtion meens she will be a high elf joining her other high elf sisters so she join Alliance :rofl:
also sed we will save Arthas from Thorgast so he is comeing back aswell …
All the cool peoples going Alliance :rofl:

1 Like

personally i believe that with half a dozen permabans the entire community would improve tenfold.

1 Like

Alliance got Kul Tirans and Mechagnomes… MECHAGNOMES!!!
If anything, this should prove, no such thing as “Alliance bias” exist
On the contrary…

I will not stop until Blizzard stops with favoring the Alliance everywhere in the lore. My fight is not over.

Nooo ! No redemption, she will never be welcome in the Alliance even if she found a way to be magically redeemed, we would still try to kill her again !

Nothing is finished or forgiven at the first occasion we run another horde city !

1 Like

also rember mechagnomes whas titanforged by titans long time before any mortal races even existed so a mechagnome can be over 50.000 years old even …

What’s that got to do with anything? If you think Savagery means dressing like a ‘bear’ and wearing BDSM gear and being a little bit excessively macho, then a dictionary may be a good investment.

Savagery comes in silk and satin varieties, as well as leather and spikes…that is why it is a mentality, not simply a dress code…

1 Like

Alliance? what alliance? should be called human and friends