Unfortunately two of the same enchant has always been ineffective for one. Last time I did it was DK years ago had to do two different runes, Also seem to recall two times Mongoose was wasted to except if you did it for the look.
The enchants stack in potency.
Basically if you have double enchant of the same type, the effects will stack, the duration and proc rate remains unchanged.
Dual wield 2H is really laughable and never existed in real history.
Even dual wield 2 x 1H weapon is historically inaccurate and almost never existed in war.
In fact, the most common and effect war weapon in history of any civilization is spear, bow, then 1h weapon + shield.
Dual wielding 2 swords, axes, maces, etc. is so stupid and ineffective in war, that it never existed in history.
Hell even Conan only wielded one two hander. Something in the name kinda gives it away as to why.
I agree. I don’t care, if it’s historically accurate, but I think it is stupid, if the “weapon master” warrior spec weilds one 2hander while fury has two 2-handers. This makes 0 sense. Fury warriors should wear 2 1handers, and have insane mobility/leech like barbarians, while arms should have a 2 hander and use maybe a small gun/crossbow, if they get kited (think of guts from berserk). This would be way more archetypical for warriors. Right now, the 2 specs are waaaay too similar
It used to be a thing, but then Blizzard happened.
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.