The Ebon Blade says no. The Forsaken do not deserve such a hallowed place.
3 Likes
Man, you are giving my argument waaaaaay more charge than it initially had.
I just wondered if this sort of scenario, had the situation been reversed, wouldâve been welcomed in such way by certain players.
Because I get the feeling, call it paranoia or whatever, that had Sylvanas been the one taking this sort of actions, the reactions wouldnât have been about âawesomenessâ and âkickasseryâ, but as just some further step down the villain road that she would have to eventually pay for. Something that seems to be unthinkable for Tyrande.
For the record, and because I know that looking for stuff in these new forums is a living hell, Iâll clarify that it wasnât me the one that started giving that head any relevance at all. Might as well had mentioned how suddenly her hair became braided.
Thatâs probably because Tyrande doesnât have several genocides in her track record.
3 Likes
Omfg read my previous post already, please!
EDIT.
Remember kids, Aunt Halasibelâs opinions are objective truth. Just saying.
2 Likes
If Sylvanas did this, and started using some Void energy to wipe Alliance, out of vengeance forâŠletâs say Zuldazar, do you think people would be as understanding?
Honest question.
Answered you bellowâŠI type as fast as I can.
No, but if Talanji did, we would be more understanding, yes.
6 Likes
No, they wouldnât because:
Yup. Itâs about the deeds of a character, about the background. Talanji doing that would be MUCH different than Sylvanas.
3 Likes
Tell that to the Shatterspear.
And how would their past make any difference at all? How does it influence current actions?
Is it solely based on some past grudge that makes player less lenient regarding someoneâs actions?
Iâll make you a deal.
Have Baine committ such an act, because a bunch of innocent Tauren get killed and I promise you, Alliance players will support him.
2 Likes
letâs just say we all have prejudices against Sylvanas. Because, well⊠Look what she have done already!
I rather it was his head the one they threw into whatever metaphorical pool said scenario had.
1 Like
You mean the tribe the evil Alliance let alone until they sided with the Horde during a faction conflict? Also, the tribe which got its vengeance with Teldrassil?
Because people are less lenient to psychopaths and murderers? Sylvanas commits genocide every faction war.
3 Likes
Personally I dislike Sylvanas for what she did to: remnants of Lordearonian forces under Garithos, remnants of Lordearonian civillians e.g. in Hilsbrad, Southshore, Gilneas, Wrathgate, Andorhal.
If a character who committ atrocities left and right does another vile thing - that annoys me. If Baine would do that, Iâd cheer for him before being obliterated by his Void-infused wrath.
1 Like
Not quick enough! I am in the office, gotta type faster!
Câmon⊠You have red background. RED GO FASTAH!
1 Like
The tribe that given Blizzard devs word, was completely destroyed in cataclysm.
And that apparently, had some of their remnants picked by Saurfang to flank the Horde army that marched north.
Fail to see how past actions define someoneâs present, when judging isolated or punctual acts treated in a vacuum.
Is it because people fear what would Sylvanas do with said power if given the chance? Or simply because âI hate her for what she did and she canât have nice stuffâ?
I mean, the declared intent Tyrande has after the ritual, points at something akin to genocide. How does that make her any different from a situation where Sylvanas is forced to do the same under similar circumstances?
1 Like
I believe itâs the last one.
I might be misunderstanding you⊠But past actions defining someoneâs present is called, in WoWâs case, a story 
2 Likes
Doesnt this remember you of someone? It quite sounds like Sylvanas when she became undead. They are just copypasting it a bit.
What Zarao means I think is the phenomenum that if Sylvanas did the same thing in the same scenario instead of that character that was glorified for it, she would be booed at⊠because its Sylvanas.
The hate on her character is so intense that people dont even look at facts anymore and just hate for hate sakes. Tahts what he is implying (or so I understand).
Its the same with blizzard. Whatever good they do, there will be always flame for the hates sake.
Lets just switch the scenario. Alliance attacks first undercity because buhu undead and horde retributes with Teldrasil.
The reaction would be the same except for âbut the alliance started itâ⊠the rest would just be the same âSylvanas is evil! She uses plague!â âBut muh honor!â âforsaken nightelves how could youâ.
Whereever there is Sylvanas in a scene and even if she is helping grandmas over the street or rescuing a schoolbus full of puppies, people would still give her poop for not being sooner there or that cause of her the bus came late 20 min⊠Ever saw Megamind? Whatever she does she is evil.
People need someone to hate and if Sylvanas wasnt alive cause of spike in wrath, they would have switched to the next lead female that does a bit controversial things⊠like Jaina
1 Like
DId we find the right dev?
The death of their chieftain was the final chapter in Shatterspear tribal history. As their former leader fell to the might of the Alliance heroes, the remaining trolls disbanded the tribe. This is the dev quote.
Where is this complete destruction? Further more, wowpedia states:
the Shatterspear have fully reclaimed all of their territories, having a massive presence in both the Shatterspear Vale and the War Camp though no longer in the Ruins of Mathystra.
That some massive presence after a genocide. And in ten short years only? Maybe less?
So, you are failing to see how peopleâs past actions might influence oneâs present opinion on them?.. Ok.
Araphant here, by the way, cba to switch for likes.
2 Likes