At the end of the day, the distinction between the stats means nothing anyway, they all do exactly the same thing, so you could easily just call it Power and be done with it.
I get it from a simplicity point of view, why always int, but it never sat well with me. Games like Everquest had a distinction between two Caster stats: Intellect and Wisdom. Wizards, Necromancers, Magicians, Enchanters, Shadow Knights would gain mana from gathering intellect, as well as mana Regen bonuses, but they gained only marginal amounts of the same when having Wisdom on gear.
Contrarily Clerics, Paladins, Druids, Rangers, Shaman and Beastlords gained primary benefit from Wisdom, and less from Intellect.
I liked that, if only for RPG reasons. When you get to the nitty gritty of WoW healing magic, it’s not an intellectual affair. Most of them heal through either sheer willpower, or some kind of spiritual understanding and knowledge. It doesn’t make much sense for intellect to be the stat that fuels them.
I mean, it’s ludicrous to me, to suggest that the primary stat of Arcane mages, their fuel, raw intelligence, given their discipline involves rigourous study and arcane/academic understanding, is precisely the same one an Orc soothsayer or Shaman requires to heal or harm. Doubly so when you consider shamanism as presented in WoW involves no logical study, no scholasticism, nothing like that. It’s purely based upon stuff you feel, sense and Intuit and folk wisdom which often runs contrary to logical understanding.
Guess it’s a peeve of mine. I like spirit being in the game because the idea healers need spirit as well as intelligence made sense, whereas warlocks and mages for example got marginally less benefit from spirit. I don’t like that as far as the game is concerned “intellect” is the thing all casters require no matter how disparate their disciplines are, or irrespective of whether one requires intellect at all (Monks, Priests and Shaman I’d argue require none. They can be clever, but it’s not like that’s key to accessing the powers involved) or you end up using such a vague notion of intellect ie “it refers to both logical understanding but also illogical intuition” you may as well not use the term at all.