Alexander III of Scotland, dies 19th March, 1286.
Braveheart opens with what I assume to be Bruce telling us the King had died without an heir. This follows the caption “SCOTLAND 1280”
Battle of Stirling Bridge.
Now this is where I get nerdy, (my nerdishness is not confined to Dante, Milton, Homer, and Virgil… it covers a lot lol)
Even though he was a landowner (something else the movie got hideously wrong) and had some military training, William Wallace was a very poor military tactician at that time. The only tactic he really knew was guerilla tactics, which worked best for him. The Forth valley at that time was a long and marshy piece of ground, the only crossing across the river was a wooden bridge which could only allow two horses side by side and at maximum 4 in a row. A maximum of 8 horses could only be on the bridge at any one time.
Wallace and his army were positioned on the hill where the Wallace Monument stands today and watched as the grossly incompetent and overconfident English commander ordered his cavalry through first. Within 10 minutes a bottleneck had formed. Seeing this happen, Wallace gave the order to charge. Seeing the oncoming Scots and knowing they were trapped, the cavalry broke. Reaching the bridge the Scots took full advantage of the chaos and slaughtered who they could before a retreat was called. The most senior English commander to be killed was Hugh De Cressingham. (He is portrayed in the movie and is killed). The English retreated and the Scots continued to both use guerrilla tactics against English forces sent to destroy them, and raid Northern England, often reaching as far as Carlisle and Alnwick.
The movie completely does away with this. It portrays the Scots using schiltrons to engage the cavalry, after two waves of archer attacks, before a melee with the infantry…
The Scots are also portrayed as wearing kilts and Wallace and his companions are seen in woad. Neither of these happened. The Scots would have worn exactly what the English infantry would have worn, hardened leather and mail. Kilts were only worn by Highlanders, and even then, plaid. Plaids were not generally worn by the Highland clans until the late 14th century. NO highlanders were present during the Wallace rebellion. The wars of independence were of no immediate concern to the Highland clans.
Neither would they have worn woad face paint, as that is a Pictish tradition. There were no Picts at Stirling Bridge. They were a dwindling sect of Eastern Scotland that soon be swallowed by the lower East Highland clans such as Murray and Ogilvie.
Battle of Falkirk.
Edward II took personal command of the English Army and marched to Scotland in 1298. He engaged Wallace at Falkirk and utterly vanquished Wallace’s Army. Wallace arranged his infantry into 4 defensive positions known as schiltrons which was an anti-cavalry tactic. It depended mostly on two things.
-
lack of archery support. Prior to Falkirk, the main archery weapon was the short bow. But after a campaign in France Edward had begun using Welsh Longbowmen as his main archery support. Seeing the Scots form into schiltrons, Edward simply ordered his longbows to tear apart the schiltrons, and rout the Scots. The cavalry and infantry mopped up the rest of the scots, resulting in a crushing defeat for Wallace. Bruce did NOT fight for any side at Falkirk, as he saw what was about to unfold. he kept away and paid homage to Edward, biding his time. Bruce did not play any further major role in the Wallace rebellion.
-
A solid defensive “wall”| that would not allow cavalry or infantry to surround the defensive position. was lacking on the field at Falkirk. Wallace made a grave error in his choice of tactic and battleground, it cost him the battle and a lot more.
Braveheart has Wallace and Edward facing off on, again, an open field. Edward sends in his Irish mercenaries. There was NO Irish contingent on any side at Falkirk. The movie shows Wallace losing the battle, and being betrayed by the Lords, and riding off to chase Edward, only to be betrayed by Bruce.
None of this happened. Wallace retreated and returned to his guerilla tactics, while Edward returned to England left the pacification of Scotland to his commanders.
Wallace WAS lured and betrayed to the English but then the movie takes an absolutely ridiculous turn for the worst. Anyone who has even the remotest knowledge of what Wallace went through in his torture would know that the very last thing he would have done, is screamed “freedom!” before being beheaded. he had just been hanged. His throat would have been crushed. he had just been dismembered. he would have been lucky to be alive. he had just been disemboweled. Again. it’s very unlikely he was even conscious if alive at this point. beheading was just a formality and mercy at that point.
If you ever want to see Scottish history murdered, and its culture betrayed, and its place in the world openly mocked, then watch this piece of garbage called a movie.
And I’m not even going to get into the blatant antisemitic piece of filth he made called “The Passion of the Christ”
Remember those movies were made by this guy.