Neither are sand, Ice, jungle or Forest trolls.
HM Tauren are still Tauren.
Dark Iron dwarves, are still dwarves.
Why do you feel like putting black/Asian humans as something beneath the rest? Thatâs really racist you knowâŚ
Dwarves come from Ironforge. And yet we have Dark Iron notably distinct.
Sand fury trolls were all part of the same tribe with the Gurubashi.
I find it funny how you switch back and forth from âhumans are representations of RL onesâ to âthey are fictionalâ.
I honestly donât need to move one bit in order to expose why throwing about distinct physical features for the race without an explanation, is a mishandling of the setting.
Let alone how obvious it is, that this is but a lazy PR move and a blatant form of tokenism.
SoâŚyou are doubling down on the fact that Black features, destined to represent RL features and inclusion, are nothing but a disease!!! WoooowâŚ
Letâs see if I can get my point across in a way that allows my to quote it for any future time when you feel like throwing, again, a distortion of itâŚ
Got it. Here:
The way these features were included cheapens narrative quality because of the reasoning used behind their inclusion, the praxis used to include them, and the circumstances that surround the rest of the races in said environment.
Pushing them for the sake of diversity but not bothering giving them any notable development. Doing so not because of ingame reasons, but because of some meta ones.
And failing to give enough background that would allow them to even compare with the rest of races that explain how their distinct groups came to be.
???
Silly me.
Why would any story element need a narrative reason?!
Why would this obvious distinct groups need the same background as the rest of distinct groups the other races have??
Honestly, sometimes canât tell if people are serious.
