Am I missing something? Stun is a really big deal, both BM and MM are ranged specs but only one gets it, you can’t even talent into stun. The tradeoff is melee range knockback/aoe but I don’ think it’s fair.
Also if you want to use your Bloodlust you need to summon pet which is instant but then to dismiss it you need to… cast. Other specs don’t have to deal with this.
I also think Primal Rage should be baseline for hunters now.
As for the stun-knockback tradeoff, personally, I can live with that.
But PR needs to be baseline!
Ancient hysteria: Removed
New ability (baseline): Hunting horn. 5 min cd, instant cast. Grants you and your party the effect pf bloodlust.
Bam, fixed. I think MM not having a stun is fine.
I wouldnt mind it if I could modify the ability like the PVP Hi-Explo trap. From M+ perspective, being a long range sniper and having knockback as utility is just contradictory. Using stun is always good.
It really irritates me that not many people, especially MM players, are concerned by not having BL readily available without a pet.
Ok, then i’d like to have an easy access to trueshot and coordinated assault as a bm hunter.
Primal rage definitely should be baseline but if they give MM hunter a stun then they should give arcane mage one as well.
That doesn’t even make sense, Tekilosh.
Yes it does. Does having lw+pr both make sense? Insomuch that i say more: only exotic pets must have primal rage and so you need to be only bm to use pr.
Total crap.
Every other class with access to BL/TW does not require a certain pet.
Blizzard semi-streamlined pets so Hunters can have what they want, but then giving us a spec which works without a pet but still requires one to be viable in M+?
Absolute nonsense and validates having PR baseline for Hunters.
It’s about time.
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.