WoW and all Expansions based on MetaCritic score

Opinion yes, of course. Having an opinion is completely valid (hopefully it is a constructive one otherwise it is generally useless) but it often comes over as some toxic hate relationship.

We see it every day on here, people how seem to have made it their live mission to destroy World of Warcraft, Blizzard and everything they do (and not only that pay them a subscription to talk about it on here)

As I said it seems very odd to me.

2 Likes

? If you mean all these anti lgbt topics. I honestly dont care about those.

I DO however take metacritics (not the user reviews) in mind.)

As do I which is why I posted it
 81 is a decent score (if not record breaking)

But meta critics barely make 80.

Its not decent at all, and it certainly aint record breaking.

Its average.

Perception.

If for example WoW solved the inventory issue by introducing a subscription for more storage. The internet would collapse over the QQ.

If FF14 did the same there wouldn’t even be a whimper.

Why do i think that
 it actually happened. FF14 changes you an extra subscription for more storage.

FF14 is like a cult to some people, they can do no wrong


2 Likes

Not really. Its optionial to get extra storage space. Thats it. Thats your perception of it. You can get a standard default retainer for free.

You could always ya know, just like in wow make alts.

Ladies and gentleman
 proof.

3 Likes

Elaborate?

You think making guildbank alt is easy to maintain? o.O

YOu’re kinda just hypocritically stating that it isnt the case for wow somehow, right?

This Jagarde dude is on the cringiest crusade ever.
Hope he’s having fun at least.

Also retainers have more slot then wow’s bank with 32 bags anyway o.O

Seriously all this shows is that the WoW community always loved to hate on WoW, when the most important MMORPG in history never went past 7.6.

Okay, But thats wrong, and you know it, cause wotlk was the first expansion where user score was a bit lower then the meta.

What’s wrong? User scores are low across all expansions, even in the “golden age”, with only Legion and WotLK getting decent scores.

What’s your point? Who the hell are you to decide what people are allowed to like or dislike about a game?

The fact you think people with different opinion to yours aren’t even capable of providing feedback shows what kind of deluded echo chamber you people live in.

? WOTLK got 7.vanilla got close to metacritic score 9.0+ when it comes to user wtf are you even on LOL

Now compare XIV with ALL expansions and see its trend? Goes higher, and higher, and higher.

Instead of looking at the average score, you should check the reviews that gave 9+ or 2 and minus that.

The success is based on the amount of people that each expansion has polarized both positively than negatively.

1 Like

Because it’s a stupid reason to hate it ‘‘There’s a gay dragon? I give it 0/10! Worst game ever made!’’

the score means nothing, no reflection on how good the game is at all.

2 Likes

Same goes for 10/10s : OMG Dragons!! I love it , kinda comments!

2 Likes

Does it really matter how a game reviews? A review is just someone’s opinion, if you have played the game, rely on your own opinion. Many movies are slated by critics at release that people love years later.

Who really care’s about it , as long as you have fun the score does not matter and the OP is just a troll repeating the same thing in many threads.