so your “evidence” is because you say so? Just making sure I got it right.
No, my evidence is as follows - I’ll make as simple as possible for you:
- you made several claims about RQ and refused to provide any evidence for them
- because of this, they become opinions
- opinions become irrelevant when faced with facts (unless you’re going to claim opinions > facts)
Ergo, your posts provide the evidence of why your opinions are irrelevant.
I guess I should’ve slowed down a lot more than I already have so you can keep up
you are still trying to deflect.
Role queue isn’t in question right now for the specific point I wanna argue with you.
“evidence” (I see you still struggle understanding the meaning of this word) does not invalidate dissenting opinions, its part of the discourse until proven beyond reasonable doubt.
still awaiting proof for this.
Facts is a strong word for what you provided so far, few polls which aren’t even as decisive as you might wish (to be seen on the recent poll) but let that rest for a second, we wanna do one step after another.
I leave the deflections, much like delusions, to you - I see the point is still flying way above your head. Would you feel more comfortable playing with something closer to your capabilities? Like play-doh?
Evidence - the thing you can’t provide let alone understand, is something I do understand, and have provided, several times.
Your opinion is utterly invalid, by sheer refusal to provide any evidence and in the face of actual evidence.
I linked a few polls - there are more. There is also word of god (aka devs word) for which, you have 0 answer for.
Every single poll - every single one, has been in favour.
You have nothing.
lets focus on the quesiton, I wanna clarify that first.
You did never provide proof for opinions being irrelevant, so still waiting. Where is it?
This is the last time I will link my posts - I will not re-link it another time just because you don’t like it
you do not need to relink them as they miss the point anyway.
Its still just your unproven opinion which you are trying to sell as fact here, something you accused me of doing just a week or so ago.
So here comes the question again.
Who determined for our society that (dissenting) opinions don’t matter?
No, they just prove the point and you can’t stand it.
your own posts disprove you - not my opinion.
h ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(law)
You have no evidence, thus your statements are opinions. Opinions are invalid vs evidence.
Deal with it
you waffle about everything but not answering the question.
you bait and switched to a weaker claim trying to evade, nice.
Evidence (you really need to educate yourself) is not proof, evidence implies open room for interpretation which usually entails discussions, further investigation, evaluation of opinions and what not. Just the presence of evidence does not invalidate anything until something is proven beyond reasonable doubt, which in spite of recent poll seems to be farher away from that point than ever.
Your question was answered repeatedly, not my problem if you’re struggling.
Invalid, irrelevant, same thing when it comes to you - there is no bait and switch. You’ve just been trolling and desperately trying to play with words to try and catch me out.
It failed.
Evidence (thing you don’t understand or provide). The evidence means your opinion is irrelevant.
Again - every. single. poll. has been in favour.
no you never delivered a proof for opinions to be irrelevant, other than your own words which by your standards seems to be good enough of a proof, glad we clarified this.
polls, conducted by a tiny minority of engaged playerbase excluding those who might have bailed the game already due to the role queue. Recent poll shows even 46% being unhappy with the queue, your “evidence” is becoming weaker as players learn to feel the downsides of it.
Except I did - feel free to go back and slowly re-read until you get it.
Glad we clarified you’re incapable of basic logic.
You have no backup for your claim of tiny minority considering I posted a few polls, there are many others.
You then hilariously claimed a poll of 35 people (almost guaranteed not to be 35 unique) is evidence enough to apply to the entire playerbase of OW - showing not only do you not understand evidence but maths too. Not to mention, you can’t answer the fact that the devs themselves, the only people with access to the full data, have outright stated majority positive response.
That alone dumpsters your entire argument kid
Thanks for continuing to prove you have nothing, are nothing, and your opinions are irrelevant.
no you didn’t, you linked some random stuff which wasn’t even remotely related to the matter in question, probably the best you’ll find tho.
You still answering proves the opposite, you seem to enjoy spending time on irrelevant opinions, don’t you?
Except it was - you refusing to accept it or acknowledge it, not my problem - it’s yours.
I note your response entirely tries to skirt around the fact the poll you’re trying to claim backs you up, has less than 0.0000001% of the player base, and is one single poll, and is still in favour of RQ, and the other points I raise.
Dodging much?
Like I said kid, if nobody educates you, you’ll go through life thinking you and your opinions matter. They don’t
all you’ve ever linked here were some sketchy polls (which you selectively invalidate depending on result) and blizzard pr statement. But all of that has nothing to do with the question why opinions are irrelevant. As for the time being there is nothing other than your own opinion about it (an irrelevant one to be exact).
The only sketchy one here is you linking a single poll that invalidates your entire point, and does not have anywhere near the amount of responses to be considered a valid dataset.
The evidence has been supplied, you raging and dodging my points doesn’t change the facts kid.
all right, a statistically relevant dataset would requrie at least 1000 participants, none of the polls you linked meet that criterium iirc.
so your own words are the proof I’m asking for? Is that correct?
But then, I posted more than one poll. You did not.
Re-read the last few posts, especially the one(s) where I pointed out that word of god > you
all of which would be viewed as statistically irrelevant by anyone who is serious into it. But I see you arbitrarely draw a line where it fits your narrative and dismiss everything else, how convenient.
word of god? wtf are you about?? Are we getting complete bonkers?
Not really, I draw the line on where’s actually relevant. You and your posts, not relevant. Your one single poll (which still proves you wrong) having not anywhere near the amount of responses to be relevant, again not relevant.
I see you’re blind - I stated word of god (aka the developers), the people with the data, have stated openly about majority positive reception to RQ. But then I would expect you to skip over that, because it totally screws you.