The MMR is really broken

Yes. Every role. You can hard carry playing support.

You really are impressionable versorius. You should stop copying others.

If you’re contributing to damaging opponents, yes, I guess so. You can’t carry as a support just by healing. But I guess it is a support so it’s your job to contribute with both.

If you’re doing that, you’re not playing support. You’re heal botting.

Heal botting can get you wins (if the enemy target focus is poor), but it is an exceptionally bad habit.

Indeed. And as such it is very much possible, and not “difficult” to carry. If you’re aim is reasonable, and your awareness and gamesense are ok… Play Bap. You’ll carry more games.

1 Like

Looks like we, and others the in community weren’t wrong about MatchMaking being terrible - source:
https ://overwatch.blizzard.com/en-us/news/23922958/.

Blizzard have confirmed though that they’re still working on it.

2 Likes

They’ve confirmed there was issue in around 1% of matches, and groups were a large reason for it.

It’s literally nothing about what you’ve claimed in the past.

They’ve also said most of the issues come from quick play and ranked using the same match maker, and pushing to shorten quick play queues means the same translates to ranked. Something they’re hoping to sort for season 4.

Just admit you were wrong and let go.

2 Likes

I read the update. I wasn’t wrong.

Right… Okay. Check out this source below:
https ://eu.forums.blizzard.com/en/overwatch/t/competitive-matchmaking/31506/4

You will see that I stated the following:

Take note of the text one team having high diamond, the other have low gold and low plat for instance

Aaron Keller stated that, “1% of matches are at roughly 10 divisions”.

^^ This is precisely matching my scenario that I called out ^^.

Your comment here is proven to be another lie.

The fact you’ve just summarised most of the latest comms detailing the issue shows that MatchMaking has many issues - basically matching the title of the post.

2 Likes

Do you know where those 1% were?

Your anecdote was nothing more than that. A tall tale.

Wrong. What Bubble said is correct, you just can’t stand being wrong.

1 Like

I know right, I literally detailed the same precise issue that I found - 6 days ago. Which is 5 days before the latest comms.

Must be difficult to understand with dogmatism though.

2 Likes

I’d rather go from the data they provided, than a single anecdote that smells a lot like confirmation bias.

Yeah 100%, but all you can do is advise and hope one listens. (Fat chance but maybe one day)

1 Like

When you are right. I’ll happily agree.
When I disagree, I’m not going to pat you on the back and say well done.

This isn’t the BBC.

I’ve literally just caught you out as a liar above… and provided a source to the actual reply to a thread.

My issue that I raised on the forums is bang on the issue that the comms has detailed.

As you’re not agreeing, it’s clear that you’re just being the usual liar, or its just pure dogmitism.

The only truth you’ve ever said on these forums:

Blizzard have literally provided the data, and an explanation - which matches my precise scenario. I am unsure what more information you need.

Smell it however you like. You’ve just been caught out as a liar again, and showing yourself to the forums that you’re unable to take in information that’s on the forums on other posts (and the posts related replies) - I’ve even provided clear source to one and quoted the text to save you the time and effort.

2 Likes

Indeed. And you’ve still somehow come to the conclusion you’ve come to.

Quit before you make yourself look worse…

1 Like

Yeah, if someone posts a tale about a game, I take it with a heavy pinch of salt. Unless they provide the game code.

I am ahead I know. Thanks.