Completely irrelevant for your argument since both are birth defects and neither of them constitutes a new gender.
1 Like
It doesnāt matter what caused this situation. What matters is that this situation does exist.
You dodged my questions. Please go back to my two examples and tell me which genders these people belong to.
Irrelevant, they are not a new gender. And I didnāt dodge your question, thatās the answer to your question.
Okay. So which gender do they belong to, then?
Itās biology right, surely itās an easy answer?
Again, irrelevant to your argument. You are just trying to deflect now.
You are trying to dodge a question you have no answer to.
Why remain so stubborn when you could just admit to have been proven wrong?
Iāve answered your question twice now. They are not a new gender.
Sex and gender are often used interchangeably, but they are two different concepts.
Sex is defined based on biological characteristics, whereas gender is a social and cultural construct. Gender identity refers to a personās internal sense of self, whether they see themselves as male, female or another gender.
I donāt understand why we have to have this same tired discussion over and over.
2 Likes
False. That is the new definition the gender cult wants to implement.
1 Like
Great. Thatās half the question answered.
Now tell me: which of the two genders do these people belong to?
Either male of female. Still irrelevant.
Just because you say it doesnāt make it so.
I honestly donāt understand why some people are so bothered about what someone else identifies as.
It makes absolutely no difference to me.
1 Like
And you canāt tell? I donāt get it.
Itās biology. Men and women have clear attributes and thatās how you know their gender, no?
So surely, you should be able to tell me which gender these people belong to?
Come on now. Male or female?
It does, because this concept didnāt exist 50 years ago. And even after that it only existed in academia untill like 15 years ago.
Because they are trying to force me to pretend men in a skirt are women. Thatās why.
1 Like
Maybe a man in a skirt isnāt a woman.
But what is a person with both male genitals and a uterus?
What point are you trying to make here? That sometimes people with birth defect donāt easily fit one gender? Thatās not the great knock-out argument youād like to think it is, mate.
2 Likes
Yes.
ānot easily fit one genderā is what being ānon-binaryā is.
Weāre making progress. You will soon be based and genderpilled.
No, youāre just conflating not obviously fitting a category with being a category.
ā¦is what being non-binary is all about.
Iām glad we finally agree.
Let us shake hands, friend, for our worldview is one and the same.
No, itās not. Non-binary means itās neither one of two, which would in fact be a new category.