0 wars in 2s top 100

The 30s row is a real issue though.
On one hand, warriors have a lack of CC in their kit, so Stormbolt has to be taken. But on the other hand, their defensives/sustain is also poor, so Impending Victory could be a solution, but that’ll make you lose that CC.
Then on a third hand, there’s a solution to warrior’s mobility issues.

So it’s basically just a matter of which one is the most important, but they’re all issues that should be taken care of in some form or another.
Choosing between bandaging 2 weaknesses is okay, but 3 is a bit too much.

Again, every class has talent like that. For Warlock it’s Demonic Circle / Coil, for Hpal it’s honor talent Light’s Grace, for Rsham it’s Unleash Life…

Well

You should get that part with you if you decide to quote me.

again applicable to most if not every classes
warrior is in no way special in this

1 Like

Still i dont like unholy, so it dosent matter to me that unhoyl is good im not gonna reroll, i like how frost was designed, but now its so trash that its disgusting, unholy frost has been competelty diffrent, Udk is supposed to be a rot slowly high sustained damage dealer with better controll, while Frost is high sustain mostly single target and good burst. and thats a completly diffrent playstyle and unholy has never been my way, so by saying just roll unholy is bs, i just roll another class.

Wars had retarded damage and mobility, dominating arena since TBC. If it’s true and they’re finally not at the very Top, feels good man. Suck it up like everybody else before.

warriors haven’t dominated arena since mop, wtf are you talking about. Not only that, but been total crap for big portion of xpacks after that and in best case okish.
Rogues otoh…

Did you miss WoD at all? including Blizzcon?

guys let me explain why wars feling bad atm war is the moast playable class since bfa s1 started so blizz to make balance between class just nerfed wars
and when anather class will take lead they will nerf it like dk wich became good and started to get alot of player bam nerf soon locks and then dh i think

Well I would like an example then. The ones you’ve listed so far don’t fit the context.

If you think Warrior has “mobility” as weakness, you’re playing it wrong.
There are classes with more weaknesses that indeed chose between badnaging 2 weaknesses, but only because the third option is unviable and they don’t even have option to banding the third one.

If you think that’s better situation then simply imagine you don’t have other talents than Stormbolt and you’re there.

You’re unironically telling me that being kited as arms is not a weakness?
I’ve already mentioned it’s a matter of priority.

That’s because that third bandage solution is not in that row. It’s somewhere else so you can pick that along with one of those two.
That’s my whole point, you got 3 options that are close to mandatory, but you can only pick one. Okayish if they’re only minor issues, but in this case if warrior had none of them, they’d be unplayable.

For warlocks, your talents are relatively the same. whichever talent provides the most damage/defense in a row is what you pick, with DC and MC being the only real choice you need to make, but DC is a meme since locks don’t care about defensive mobility.
Same with your shaman example, picking Unleash Life or not is just a matter of if it puts out more healing than the other choices.

If warriors had a row dedicated to CC, one to mobility and one to healing or a hybrid between two I’d agree with you .

It is. But usually player’s weakness, not class weakness.

you don’t seem to comprehent Locks at all, they do care about mobility… but they have none, adding DC doesn’t fix anything, everything can still connect.
It’s like if your survivability was bad and you had talent that heals you for 1% max HP every 60 sec. Not taking that talent doesn’t mean you have great survivability. Just that it doesn’t help you enough for it to be worth it.

That’s because you failed to comprehend what I am saying. Warrior isn’t the only class that has multiple “weakness-solvers” on same row. It’s irrelevant parameter you chose there.
Also choosing between solving a weakness from multiple choice is generally much better than having a choice in first place.

Warlocks don’t take DC because they’re too slow and threatening in their casting that it wouldn’t do them any good anyway. Better stick with more CC, which also guarantees their damage, and some extra sustian.

I’m still waiting for that example of yours.

Example isn’t as important if you read the following sentence.

Thank you for trying.

I feel it’s not important thing to waste my time on to show you example of something that doesn’t have any value, when I explained in following sentence that what you consider downside is actually upside.

Well, I mean, 2 warriors in top 100 is better than 0, is it not? 23th and 95th.

This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.