Hi!
instruction:
- prepare you favorite book or movie.
- join any premade discord
- join BG
- kill galv commanders and Tower Point commanders.
after you have 2 ways:
- if you team dominate and horde don’t turtle - you play to end
- if you see turtl - /afk and go read you book/watch movie for next 15 min
- go to 1.
Let’s discredit this retarded ranking system together. May be blizz will make another system, like RBG then.
More skill = more raiting better then more time spend for repeating kill NPC = higher rank.
3 Likes
“More skill” it’s a damn MMORPG not a FPS arena. Stop attempting to turn it into a competitive game. Retail suits you better: equal races, equal classes, no rng procs whatsoever.
7 Likes
No hope Blizz wont love the system. Cry cry you dont have enough of time to get ranking. Go back to Retail.
The whole honor system in classic is competitive?
You’re literally facing against each other lol.
What exactly am I meant to get out of this?
You’re stating don’t turn it into a competitive game, but the whole PvP system in classic is competitive.
2 Likes
7500-10000 per hour isn’t enough
With “skill” you make 25k/h in av consistently. The better players play less and achieve more
We already have a skill based pvp ranking system in retail. Classic ranking must stay as authentic as possible.
This might actually be the first time I’ve ever agreed with you.
I never wanted to ask this But…but AV honor farm is all about PVE!
how come a pvp system is based on killing npc’s? and not on killing players alone!
1 Like
First of all, it is not. Do you even know what a competitive game is? Secondly, the ranking is another story. I am talking about the interaction between you and your enemy. In a MMORPG such interaction can never be ipso facto competitive, especially if gear based and class based like Classic.
Retail has progressively changed into a competitive formula, because of blizzard’s desperate tryhard attempt of fitting the game into the esport cancer. In fact, gear and class are already way less relevant to the outcome of the fights (classes are basically the same, one stun on interrupt one heal one burst), let alone variables beyond players control such as the hugely impacting rng procs which are abundant in classic and nonexistent in retail.
Good sign; you are learning ^^
Competitive games are those in which players play against one another and where one player winning means another player loses
Do you need a better explanation?
Competitive = You are competing against each other.
Cooperative = You are working together.
Classic ranked = Competitive.
You evidently have no experience in nor comprehension of the subject. Back to Habbo please.
You clearly don’t understand what competitive means.
Competitive = Competing against other players.
The whole original post was about ranking.
What are you not getting, or is your reading skill not that developed yet?
Ranking in WoW = Competitive, thus PvP in WoW is competitive.
Thus, classic is a competitive game for PvP.
2 Likes
Competitive and competition (competing) are not synonymes.
You can compete without being competitive. That means you suck.
Or when it comes to games, competitive is not competition. Is the ability to compete on equal terms.
1 Like
Hardly, it’s because this is a different topic to your usual “everything is the Horde’s fault for wanting shamans instead of paladins!”
Do you know how pvp system works ?
1 Like
nope man
people have differint skill level and game understanding
in current ranking system:
- unskilled and averege pleyers that sitting more time on chair gain better rewards then skilled people sitting less time on the chair
- personal lvl doesent matter
- people begin to differentiate groups by ranks, not by personal skill level
Look at AV premade discords. they making different rooms for different rank people. And imbiciluses that 14 hours a day running to kill NPC can associate themselves as "elite"
2 Likes