true they don’t need a redemption they need a execution it’s time to sweep aside the filth that is the horde once and for all justice for the fallen
The problem with A Good War is that it also plays on the sense that the Horde needed to be the aggressor for something they shouldn’t have started. Which is a lead-in as to why I agree with some Alliance folk in that they should have been the ones to start it for the ‘War of Survival’ effect.
A war over resources and rebuilding at this point has become much more preferable than this… whatever this is… that came from A Good War. So really, using that as material proof - especially when it still involves the Alliance - doesn’t feel very convincing.
1 Like
The problem with A Good War is that it also plays on the sense that the Horde needed to be the aggressor for something they shouldn’t have started. Which is a lead-in as to why I agree with some Alliance folk in that they should have been the ones to start it for the ‘War of Survival’ effect.
Its not about survival its about how you conduct a war, a “good” war would be to treat PoW’s in a respectful manner and not kill innocent people. An example of this is the second world war…the Germans didn’t use gas so the Allies didn’t use gas…however one sided uses it once and that is over.
The Horde is already using total war tactics…murdering civilians and using plague…so anything the Alliance do now seems pretty fair game.
And yet still, for a reason born out of fear. If the tree was held in arrest, that would’ve made it better. But not by much.
Why? Because it would’ve always ended up to this:
As already explained it is about the conduction of war that’s referred to here.
Now everyone agrees that the Horde being the agressor is just Dumb.
And technically incorrect.
Stormheim can be compared to the assasination that triggered World war 2.
By all rights and means the Alliance should be from a historical pov the aggressor.
But as per usual anything the Alliance does is not probably explored.
While if the Horde raises a random Corpse it is the biggest evil in the World.
1 Like
- An assassination was the excuse to start world war I. Not two.
- If you believe the war started because of the assassination, you need to pick up a book.
5 Likes
This is just unbelievable.
With love,
Hala
2 Likes
Basically, yeah.
Look at the Broken Shore.
The possibility about Sylvanas maybe leaving Varian to die was seen as a valid excuse to start attacking the Horde.
What would’ve happened if the Horde had truthfully done so? Or even better, what would’ve happened if they had downright tried to assasinate Anduin/Varian like Genn tried with Sylvanas?
1 Like
Alliance nut jobs setting the forums on fire. Just like we did with Teldrassil 
ya know
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMTQ1NjAxMDUzN15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwOTE5NDM3MDE@._V1_.jpg
2 Likes
And Horde players doing nothing better than stoking the fire instead of being helpful? Yeah, I get what you mean.
3 Likes
Best cinematic in-game. Genn committing both assassination and genocide via a slap, apparently.
edit: Slapicide? Slapassination?
3 Likes
It’s me right there to the left!
2 Likes
gets more fuel to feed the fire totally.
Though, to be fair, I understand how it can be frustrating for the Horde when a character does not suffer any consequences for clearly wrong acts.
Like Sylvanas after Gilneas, Hillsbrad, Southshore, the Undercity experimentation…
2 Likes
I think, we can all agree that everything done against the will of Sylvanas should be labeled as “the worst thing imaginable”.
1 Like
Wrathgate, Pit of Saron, the rest of Lordearon, Battle of Undercity…
I am so “the worst thing imaginable” right now.
2 Likes
The slaughter of Garithos’s men and dwarves…
1 Like
There isn’t any character that has as much of a death flag painted on her back like Sylvanas. Horde characters are always brought to justice when they do wrong. Alliance ones get a kiss on the hand from the writers instead. “Just wait and see.”
Like Sylvanas suffered narrative consequences?
2 Likes