Okay, princess.
Would you like transmog too?
Perhaps some pretty mounts? Several thousand of them? Dragons, mechasuits, elementals, you name it.
Here comes the Archfreeze circus, everybody gets to look fabulous.
I’m on the phone to Activision now, my grandmother is CEO, rest assured I will not sleep until I have this change made for you.
so what are their use then? you can get a new beard/haircut… but whats the use in that?
sorry but classic/vanilla is based on the idea that you are who you are from the second you create your character… changing any of that (especially en mass) is going to destroy the identity of people you think you know, including your own.
EDIT: if you think i will ever get tired of my braided hair and beard you’re severely mistaken.
I feel like the chances of them making real money barbershop are higher than just usual in-game barbershop
Barbershop wasnt in Vanilla
Aesthetics.
You’re not being genuine in your argument here, I feel. Being able to change your character’s look is useful, there’s no way around it unless you try to play with the definition of “useful”.
Word.
10char
I didn’t play retail since cata and i don’t plan on ever playing it again.
Was layering in vanilla? Or raidloot that is tradeable for 2 hours? Or classic spellbatching? Turning addons on/off ingame instead of needing to logout? There are 100 things different than in real vanilla. But i guess these changes don’t bother you right? God help us if we can edit hair oh no!!!
I dont see why it’s a problem?
Basically create a character you like the look of and no need for barbershop.
Get bored of that look? Roll an alt, simples
No thank you! #NOCHANGES ! Go back to retail if you wish to be a pretty boy that does his hair all day. People do not want this, people want better item restoration for example, better customer service, etc.
Funny how nochanges only applies to things other people want, but layering is okay.
Unfortunately, the slippery slope is very real in classic. Every change that Blizzard does, adds fuel to the fire for more changes. The problem is the playerbase more than anything else. I do agree that Blizzard started the population problem by not having enough servers initially, and failed to act quickly enough when they saw megaservers forming and faction imbalance running rampant, but what could they have done?
They add layers to enable people to play on servers hosting too many players. People complain about layers.
They cap the population of a server, which is what locking the servers did. Players complain about not being able to roll on the same servers as their “friends”.
They offer free transfers to low pop realms. Players do not want to transfer and lose their guilds and friends on their current server.
They are forced to have queues, but then players complain about queues.
They could fix their servers to handle all the players on a server, plus new transfers, plus new players, without layering, then people complain about the scarcity of resources and other negative consequences of a population 4 - 5x higher than the game was designed for.
If you look at Ironforge.pro EU could have a healthy and roughly balanced population without queues on every server if players were simple willing to transfer.
Personally, I think they should remove the lock, cap the servers at 5K players, remove the layers, offer free transfers from the dominant faction to low pop realms and leave it in the hands of the players.
It’s for this very reason I was against the Black Lotus change.
It was actually a very logical change, I have no problem with the effect, but the precedence that it sets.
J Allen Brack was right in that a large number of players, did in fact think they wanted Classic, but really they don’t.
Unfortunately they will not rest until they have bought Classic down for those of us who do enjoy it.
For these anarchists, what’s better than ruining one World of Warcraft? Ruining two World of Warcrafts!
Retail features that have already been added to classic:
i rather have lfg function so i dont have to manually make a group.
Hell no!
Horrid change that will be
thats because I cant stand boosters you #nochanges degenerate.
The thing is there actually WAS a LFG function in Vanilla. It should be in Classic but Blizz knows some of their audience freaks out when they read those three letters, so they did not put it in Classic.
Yet another #change - and I bet people actually would use the vanilla LFG tool nowadays.
Dont think anyone does but a LFG function wont solve anything