You are naming and shaming, i am just sharing feedback
It does say its bis for Prot, Holy and Ret.
Thats not what naming and shaming is.
1 Like
Not doing that just asking why you feel the need to post on many chars and deny the ring which has been proven by many posters not to be BiS.
That is not feedback.
I am not. I am still covering the gems by talking about their strength. The Ring is BiS for your class.
Not for you to decide. If you push your narrative by making it look like more people share your PoV (intended or not) then yes, it would also be âour businessâ for you are spreading false information.
1 Like
Heâs not naming and shaming, moreso just naming. Anyway if you are a prot paladin then yes, small upgrade over previous BIS 639 ring.
1 Like
Then why try and deny that you were double posting and now derailing and trolling and threating people in your posts.
Resorting to insults as you have been caught out double posting and trolling about the ring .
Please reply to my post. Why are you calling your posts feedback when you refuse to take the words of a WoWhead guidewriter?
So you refuse to believe the people that actually know what they are talking about and still dare to call your words âfeedbackâ, while altposting at the same time, got it.
1 Like
Your feedback boils down to you saying due to the stats on the Isle Ring in comparison to a crafted ring that its worse. This is false.
You said its crap with all gems available. This is false.
You said the ilvl is misleading and nowhere near as good as the item level suggests. This is false. Even the 636 version of the ring outscales my crafted ring.
You said the gems are stuck at 619, which I doubt as it would make the entire upgrade of the rings pointless and the logs will likely reflect this sometime soon.
You said the ring gives no proper stats so its a useless ring. This is false on two accounts. It does give stats with the correct gems and its not useless from a performance point of view.
You said its not worth over a 636 ring. This is false.
You said its an unfinished ring. You may be right but you cant back it up. They donât want it as overpowered as the annulet from Dragonflight and this is apparent with their intention for the ring to be replaced by S2 high m+ (likely 4/6 Hero) / mythic raid gear.
2 Likes
You not being educated enough to understand said data does not mean it doesnt existđ
But hey, you do you, dont use the ring, no one will listen to you anyways and use the ring.
1 Like
just a heads up at least in some parts that person you are talking to is right
Atleaset they are using data and not calling it bad and just trolling the thread on multi chars with no proper feedback or details to back up your claim even when given multi sources on data to look up.
1 Like
Those bis lists assume you can get all the citrines you want and you have the ring at max level fyi
It doesnt because we are discussing the ring with all gems available. Not week 1 pre hotfix where we had access to 2 gems + a healing gem.
Your linked article is outdated.
But there main is a PROT PALA and what people is saying is true.
You can get all gems right now
It is still bugged so no you are not correct that it is all available also that data does not yet really exist as the change to this being a real thing happend TODAY.
But all this does not change the fact that the Bis list assumes a max ilvl ring with all things possible to get.