The amount of 
used in the post is equal to the level of validity the presented argument has. Or at least some people apparently think so.
They are just trolling, let them have some fun
1 Like
Meta is ruining the game for many, yet improving it for some. I personally dislike metas. People getting rejected into guilds/dungeons because they like to play class X with spec Z.
I also understand why some people play for maximum efficiency, but I think metas ruin for more players compared to the âwinnersâ.
Yes you can find like-minded players, but thanks to the metas, WoW offer fewer people with acceptance.
I would suggest maybe going to a pve server seeing as people are less competitve there mostly the meta is not infecting those servers as much (but still it reares its ugly head there as well ofc)
1 Like
Thanks for the tip buddy 
have a good day further.
1 Like
and this is why tbc is more garbage than it was 10y ago and wotlk is going be a lot worse because of nochanges. all these fotm rerollers will pick only whats op and you end up hating this game.
there is no place for ppl wh want to play what they like and making fun of it.
Well like I told Bulkzilla the pve servers are atleast not as stupidly focused on the meta as the pvp servers are (I should know I transfered from Stonespine during classic vanilla and it was night and day when it came to what people saw as acceptable from not seeing any deep prot warriors left on stonespine for example to seeing them fairly regualary on Mirage)
1 Like
all i said was about pvp i dont care about pve. its so fun getting rekt by kids playing lock rog over and over again. i jsut cant play this bullsh-it
i still have hope for wotlk but its going to be same as this
well then I sadly cant help you find a comunity that you will enjoy more 
Not how this works
Not necessarily true
Lol you say perception is useless against 7/9 classes.
Then you realize you meet one of the 2/9 classes 90% of the time, if not both together.
So youâre saying druids and rogues are OP, and human racial is the only thing that keeps those two classes from going completely unchallenged?
Got it. Human racial OP because making meta less meta.
Looks about 50 - 50 to me , of course im judging the top 100 , and not the entire population because i really dont care what noobs play. And its 50 50 only because they dont rly care that much about racials, ppl like to stack on 1 realm 1side , like old Stormscale days, racial comes second.
Actually its exactly how this works, l2p
True 100%, i wil edit it out
Youâre free to believe that if youâd like, but youâd be wrong
Yes i back up my belief with facts, please provide some argument so i can destroy it here with 1 reply and show you how clueless and noob you are. Please do it
Havenât seen any facts what so ever posted
Itâs not as simple as just saying X is better than Y, because theyâre good at different things. If Iâm playing rogue/mage, I would rather be alliance when playing against another rogue/mage, but I would rather be horde if I was playing against druid/warlock, so it depends on how the meta looks and what youâre more likely to play against, which changes over the course of the expansion.
It can also depend on what comp youâre playing. If Iâm a resto druid and want to play druid/warrior, alliance is likely better for me since that gives my warrior another way to get out of a root or slow, which is a concern for the warrior in that comp. If Iâm a resto druid and want to play druid/rogue however, horde is probably better for me since my rogue being able to break an additional fear is a pretty big deal for that comp.
Itâs simply not as one dimensional as you try and make it out to be.
In the top 100 rogues in 2s thereâs 32 Alliance and 68 Horde ones.
Becouse undead are popular, human isnât fun in a fantasy game, but humans are the strongest race for a rogue open your eyes hordes in arenas are in disadvantage.