Backdoor in AV

WoW Classic WoW Classic General Discussion
41

I know what an exploit is and it’s always a thing in the game, be it a shortcut or an unintended effect. First thing is how would Blizzard know this is being done? It may be obvious to us but Blizzard need proof.

That’s my point, most people here have given opinions, just like I have but no one has given proof it’s against the rules. All people have said is that it’s an exploit, something on which I disagree, it’s co-operation, and if it breaks Blizzards rules.

I know Blizzard cannot make a specific rule about everything but all their rules involve things ingame. For instance, all blizzard can prove about gold selling is that someone gave someone else gold without anything in return, possibly to more than one person.

What about the XP potion ban or the one for T-Morph? I also do not think that Blizzard do everything up until an appeal automatically.

42

Server logs and warden. The XP pot got attention in social media, so it spurred action, while the warden dealt with tmorph.

It’s possible to “sniff it out” via probability estimations. As in what the chances are X amount of people are grouped together in AV repetitively, in a given window of time. (The larger the group we’re talking about, the more unlikely it happens naturally each time it’s repeated.)

The forum threads aren’t exactly hiding it either.

I literally explained the mechanisms of why it’s an exploit and falls under the definition. Now you’re just acting obtuse.

1 Like
43

yes blizzard please fix backdoor exploit and not premade group …
!@#$ing braindead players

44

I agree with you on this, the backdoor needs fixing but I disagree that the premade group is cheating or an exploit. And the last part is unneeded.

45

Almost none of my games vs ally pugs are won by using backdoor. I do agree that it should be fixed though, same as solo pulls for Drek and Van.

1 Like
46

Your “opinion” on that it’s not an exploit is just sophistry.

3 Likes
47

oh really then give us an option to que as a premade

1 Like
48

Then the nochanges crowd start up as it wasn’t in classic.

and your “opinion” is just vilification of those who do it and seen as unfair.

49

You’re beyond hope.

50

okay , backdoor exploit was in classic and yes no changes

51

All I did was push your comment back at you.

52

No, you’re just willfully acting obtuse. Which is why you’re beyond hope. It’s also the reason why you won’t receive any counterarguments from me again as everything that’s needed to be said has been said.
So I’ll just make fun of you instead.

2 Likes
53

I was making my point directly and exactly. I don’t think it’s against the rules and you do, nothing can move one of us to the others opinion.

54

You didn’t present any substantive argument. Look back at your previous posts.
Hard to make a point when you’ve got none.

55

what are u talking about ? alliance have elite at stoneheart graveyard, stormpike graveyard and one that patrolls aid station.

1 Like
56

I thought I made my point well, exploits are only ingame, so this co-ordinated external queuing isn’t an exploit. No one has proved it is.

57

And this is where the laughable part comes in.
Now go back and read that long post earlier in this thread yet again, because there seems to be something not making its way into your head for some reason.

Which is why I said you’re acting willfully obtuse.

58

I read it and I don’t agree with it. I am not missing the point at all, I am disagreeing with it, that is something completely different. except for someone who is dismissive of others point of view.

59

That’s not how substantive argumentation works.
Present your reasoning as to why you don’t agree with it.

Or are you scared because you know it’s just sophistry? Hmm?

60

You really are the one being obtuse. I did present my reasoning, many, many times. But your dismissive nature is ignoring it.