there are 2 problems here.
- there is no “least worst outcome”, it’s a pug bg, it ends with a loss or a win, so there is a bad outcome (loss) and good outcome (win). If it was smt like “you will lose but you’ll either lose 5points or lose 55points” then yea, i would go for the “least worst outcome”.
- our whole disagreement is not on if we should play objectives or not. I said twice that i’m not saying that objectives are bad, it’s just that in pugs you can not expect ppl to think entirely around them. Most of them get mad the moment you use the “f-ing” word before flag or base. So it’s not a matter of pick red or blue pill (dmg or objectives). It’s a matter of how willingly the pug you are in will cooperate and work towards objectives smart. Do you think in a pug, the majority of ppl, will go for smart plays or just zug-zug? And yes i know of the disc-prev cancer. Balance in this game is smt that i’ve learnt to leave out of the equation since devs have proven more than enough that they don’t give a *…
You are talking about a bracket that ppl start using some braincells. I know, not always. But still better than sub 1.7-1.8k that i’m talking for. Cause right now the majority of ppl are around 1.5-1.6k. Might not seem a big difference but it kinda is considering the rating changes per match and how many ppl play right now since it’s the 1st week