It is simple. What did you not understand from the post?
The connection between the two. Please tell me. What is the EU and what diabolical Metal Gear Solid-esque plan are we all missing, and how is it connected to these new rules?
If youâre talking about the thought process behind supporting the two, and how they are similar. I donât agree.
One is about a private company doing what a private company is able to do and you can stop using itâs services if you disagree with their practices that much, and one is about a governing body, which operates under completely different rules.
Isnât that like everybody?
Sylvanas isnât a blood elf tho. She died before high elves started calling themselves blood elves
Interesting to see how so many ppl have no problem with undermining basic necessities to sustain a free society.
Repeating invalid arguments does not make them any more valid.
There is no âracismâ. There is no âhate speechâ. They are all tools to suppress people and steer the west right into the abyss.
Could you tell me how spamming TriHard in twitch chat or spamming the n word everytime a person with black skin enters the field of vision is an example of enlightened western free speech? (because this WILL happen if the chat isnât moderated)
And how a private company imposing steps to curb this kind of toxic behaviour amongst other things (they can do this because itâs a free society) is âundermining basic necessities to sustain a free societyâ?
Opting out from using the forced-link platform is a good way to completely circumvent any and all problems that the word/emote banlist might impose.
If I was afraid of losing my account and wanted to chat, Iâd go in a discord channel (or similar) with likeminded individuals and either chat there or have someone host the OWC stream and use that as a chat platform.
Blizzardâs reach doesnât extend to other channels or platforms in this new system, their only interest is having the product, OWC and by proxy itâs associated chat, be clean and nice in order to attract/not drive away potential sponsor- and partnerships.
I was pondering over the same thing. Then I came to the conclusion that a really large tin foil hat is required, and couldnât find one.
Most of the time the connection is a feeling of âfree society is under attack by big faceless authoritarian entities I donât understand.â (attach political ideology I donât agree with)
It almost always merges into some sort of vaguely defined conspiracy without anything of substance to hold on to, so itâs hard to argue against. You canât easily disprove âa feelingâ created by ignorance. At least not to the person youâre arguing with.
I should stop trying.
Its more about losing control over what you are able to say, do and think. Giving that control to an absurd politically motivated group who are attempting to usurp society from its free thinking and challenging nature. All over the western world cultures and long standing beliefs are being trodden on for a supposed greater good.
Losing ones country and national identity, giving it over to a superstate and thinking its a good thing is akin to thinking its a good thing that what you do and say in one part of the internet will have a detrimental affect to what you are allowed to do on another.
So people thinking its a good thing that you get banned from Blizzardnet when you posted a âbannedâ meme, emoji on twitch is liken to giving Europe power and then wondering why we lose control over how, what, who and when we govern within our own country.
There is a startling parallel within all of this modern lefty skulduggery to how many have foreseen the collapse of society.
I myself am looking forward to the day I can kneel to salute the EU caliphate, with my head rolling on the floor a moment later.
See, I should stop trying. Do I dare asking you for sources?
See, that last sentence was more tongue in cheek. It is nice that you avoid everything else I said and instead focus on that though. Makes you seem very good at not discussing the point while making no point and yet giving yourself the feeling that you are on some kind of high ground with that really good point as back up.
So yeah, perhaps its best if you stop trying. Seeing as you didnât try in the first place.
The rest of your post was equally insane, but that last âtongue in cheekâ sentence gives me a good idea where you are coming from.
But to entertain youâŚ
What greater good? If you want to have this argument you gotta define this. Where does it come from, who is pushing it?
If I have to respond to the rest of your points, I have to know this first.
Edit, also please tell me how western society is going to collapse and what the cause will be. I canât wait for the theories.
Ill go ahead and call it the greater good of acceptance of everything. Except those who donât agree with accepting everything.
For example, I donât accept that there are more than two genders and because of that Iâm apparently âtransphobicâ. Another example is that I donât accept that we should let those with certain religious beliefs get away with making their own laws or breaking ours simply because its their religion, or giving leniency because of said religion.
The apparent greater good is making sure everyone can be whatever they want without the discourse on whether or not they should. Should enabling people who think they are a different gender to that with which they are born be seen as good? Or that you are simply ignoring the fact they might have a mental disorder.
Going deeper into that particular point. There is a mass hysteria sweeping our nations right now on this gender debacle, yet everyone is so caught up with wanting to appear to appease their ârightsâ and look as politically correct as possible that an entire generation, if not more, will be at the determent to this way of ignoring the actual issue.
If in any way shape or form, you disagree with the political correctness or disagree people who think they are something they are not. Or you say you are against a group of people because you think their beliefs should be reformed from the dark-ages then you face the real risk of punishment.
Another example of this malarchy, is that recently within the EU a point was made to stop members from calling immigrants illegal even though they are migrating illegally. The EU is a lefty organisation, migrants by far and away tend to vote towards to left. The EU want more migrants so they get more votes.
The âgreater goodâ is about stopping nationalism, making it out to be bad, racist and everything else 'ist. Itâs about giving people the illusion of democracy, yet undermining it.
I could go on about what this âgreater goodâ is, but Iâve got to start cooking dinner soon. So thats a basic answer to how I personally see the âgreater goodâ, who is pushing it and where it comes from.
Edit: history. com/news/8-reasons-why-rome-fell
Check out the 8 reasons why the roman empire fell.
Brilliant⌠we got to Rome pretty quickly.
. <------ Point
----------------------------------------------------> . You
Oh no no, my friend.
Carry on with your depressing rantâŚ
Its ok, you can pull the wool back over your eyes now.
To be clear: Sex is something different than gender. If you want to simplify it, Sex is biological, gender is a social construct. For most people sex and gender line up. As an example: I am biologically male (as far as I can tell, I havenât checked my chromosomes), and I mostly fit into the little box society deemes to be âmaleâ. For some people however, sex and gender donât line up. We call these people transgender. Their biological sex may be male for example, but they identify with certain characteristics and social roles we as a society see as âfemaleâ. The disconnect between the two is called gender dysphoria. Transitioning to the gender role they feel like can help lessen this.
Short interesting video to clarify: Search âWhat is Gender? | Philosophy Tubeâ (for some reason I canât post links)
And yes, denying the existence of trans-people is in fact transphobic because youâre continuing the social stigmas around gender (saying itâs the same as sex for example) that can lead to gender dysphoria. You seem to confuse and conflate sex and gender quite a bit, I suggest looking into it a bit more.
The rest of your post reminds me of what supporters of the anti-semitic âgreat replacement theoryâ say, and Iâm not going to open that bag of snakes now. So Iâm gonna link you a very good vid on the issue.
Search: The Great Replacement Isnât Real - ft. Lauren Southern (donât worry guys, Iâm not a supporter of Lauren Southern, sheâs insane.)
And one on the Rome thing, search Stefan Molyneuxâs Fall of Rome - A Response
Have a nice dinner.
I really really wanted to include the links, but I was silenced for 24 hours and apparently I still donât have the right back lol.
No, itâs not. Itâs a union of 28(27 soon) European countries, some of which have left leaning governments and some right. Actually the immigrant problem is pushing a lot of people to vote for right leaning parties.