In PVE why would anyone pick any ranged class over BM Hunter?
I am OK with my Demonology Warlock, but still would not pick it instead. I played Balance a lot but they have changed it for the worse now, Shadow Priest is bad at AoE, and cannot think what any other ranged class could offer over the BM Hunter.
Play style , class fantasy, ofspecs , hating pets, dealing dmg on your own instead of bunch of pets , overal love towards specific char over years , enjoyment of pretty tmogs ( we all know mail sux) etc etc, there is actualy many reasons why not main BM
I havenât done any dungeons in SL and have no idea but in my bfa experience Iâm very skeptical about hunters unless i know the person. They usually suck. I mean thereâs no middle ground, they are either insanely good or stereotypical âhuntardâ. Think thatâs because bm and demo entry levels are not the same. Iâd prefer the demo if given two players had the same rio, because hunter might have gotten carried by the spec itself.
Balance is bad? Shadow is bad at AoE? What are you smoking exactly? Both are neither or even close to it. Pre-patch as is is in no way representative of how specs will play come DF since thereâs legendaries/conduits/whatever else that enable some straight private server-esque shenanigans (look at balance druid lmao).
Also yeah, like somebody above already said, some people prefer a interactive rotation than that of BM hunter, or hunters in general.
Depends on the type of PvE. For solo content, hunter always. For group content where you wonât be constantly bashed in the face, everything else is a lot more engaging imo.
BM is pretty good at handling mechanics without effort, and it is also good to keep your DPS optimal while you reach over for your coffee mug or to have a glass of water. From an entertainment standpoint it feels to be about as flat as a sheet of paper (it has a higher skill ceiling now, but you do not even need to reach for it to do decent damage with them, and it does not change the overall gameplay much).
I much rather go for other ranged classes: Fire mage, Affliction/Destro/Demo warlock (eventhough destro is pretty close to BM in terms of difficulty, minus the being mobile part). I would have said Shadow Priest as well, but I did not feel shadow ever since they destroyed their Legion-style gameplay that rewarded playing well around your void form.
Both mages and warlocks bring more to the table on top of it. Even if I do less damage on my warlock compared to a hunter I still have gateways and healthstones I can drop either before pull, or on the spot. I can also soak some mechanics that hunters can only do so with the use of turtle, which is a DPS loss for them.
I had this problem. I love the class fantasy, to have a pet, etc. But somehow it was very boring to play it when you reach max level. Even as someone who like more easy and simple classes/specs, it just felt that something is missing. And no matter what I play and try, Shaman is my go to class and always come back to it. Mage was the closest to it, but the downside is it doesnât have healing spec or healing spells. Shaman gives me that diversity and the class fantasy is awesome! So I stick with it.
Alternatively you can give a try to vulpera mages, as they have a (very limited) form of healing with their racial.
Outside of that, as a mage you have to anticipate how much damage you are going to take. Careful use of alter time can revert 10 seconds worth of damage, so you can use it when you gathered a bigger pack, and if you drop to low HP you click it again and it reverts you back to full HP.
Nothing you can do about the lack of healing spec, sadly. It is also why I shifted back to play my monk instead. I love playing my mage, but the lack of role flexibility means I cannot play him as a main anymore.
iâve played Beastmaster since the very start of wow marksman and survival never seemed that fun as for warlock i played Demo until they destroyed it then i went Destruction