Can't put decent title because I will spoil next patch

the point at which you’re trying to reduce or excuse a character’s villainous actions, as opposed to providing evidence that they aren’t villainous at all, is the point at which you’re admitting they’re a villain.

the list contained 11 items. you’re focusing on three of them. this is dishonest.

also interesting to note you don’t consider using the plague to be terribly villainous.

sylvanas is not being “thrown down the villain drain”. she’s been circling it since TFT with all the villainy she’s engaged in. your refusal to acknowledge this is neither here nor there.

no.

the day Tyrande has spent literal decades overlooking crimes committed in her name and working for herself above everything else, you might have a point. if they turn Tyrande evil in a way that makes sense for her character and people complain about it, you will have a point. as it stands you’re just gainsaying.

i think we’re done here.

1 Like

it’s quite funny that you’re interpreting her momma bear act towards the Forsaken as an actual Forsaken might, i.e. as a sincere expression of affection towards them, while ignoring all the evidence that explicitly tells you she’s a self-serving villain who’s only interested in her own ends. the entire point of Edge of Night is to show us all that Sylvanas views the Forsaken as nothing more than a means to an end - she’s not mad at Garrosh for abusing the Forsaken, she’s mad at him for misusing her “bulwark against the infinite”.

it’s also telling you chose to bring this up instead of answering my question - does she or does she not try to trick her sister into becoming undead in War Crimes?

you mean killing characters off in a way that makes sense for the character?

i’m looking for an official source, not a rephrased interpretation from an intro to a Wowhead article - which, by the way, later goes on to state that the pact with the Valkyr was merely the first act of the Jailer courting Sylvanas and actually talks about how much sense the whole thing makes in context with the addition of the Jailer. which kinda runs a weed-whacker through your argument that the Jailer reveal removes logic from this narrative thread.

you’re now dredging up Sylvanas’ willingness to ignore orders as a means to prove she’s not a villain who’s out for her own ends. madness.

either way the incident in Silverpine happens a solid decade into her service to the Horde. she followed orders before then, and continued to follow orders afterwards too.

i mean, there’d be objections from fanboys who like the character and want only good things to happen to him.

for example, Sylvanas Windrunner leads a faction that explicitly tortures innocents as part of its day to day operations, and she herself commits at least one major villainous act in every expansion since Wrath - yet there are still people who insist her current predicament is unjustified in the lore despite the fact it makes perfect sense.

… thanks to Sylvanas’ burning of Teldrassil. Sylvanas’ crime drove the narrative forward; Tyrande’s arc in BfA and SL is part of the fallout.

see the difference?

black eyes are not unique to Night Elves.

… same as the Trolls, right? there’s a reason these zones exist, and it has nothing to do with furthering the narrative development of Night Elves or Trolls.

the story isn’t being ruined just because it’s pivoting away from what people want to see. i don’t recall you complaining when the Night Elves were being slapped around by the Horde in lands they’ve successfully defended from the same people for decades.

not what’s happening with Sylvanas.

so much for an “unhealthy approach”, eh?

2 Likes

The point at which people feel the necessity to bring out of its context whatever menial act of evil they can find, is the point at which it becomes apparent that they are grasping at whatever they can.

Half the list there is comprised by either menial acts that almost every character in the setting is “guilty” off, or the randomised iteration the character had in BfA, that required of writers to discard past development through retcons, or downright ignore whatever virtue this past attitude was accompanied with.

Having a hard time reconciling the “She disobeyed her superior” with “She is obviously a villain beyond redemption”.
If you do, well, you may want to take a look at the rest of characters in the setting.

Cba to tackle the rest of reasons separately because they all fall under the aforementioned groups of either “She stole some candy”, or “She behaved as a psycho after writers suddenly made her into one”.

Neither of which poses what i’d call a logical development towards villainy.
If you do, then i guess that you see it coming if Tyrande bites it because of that one time she talked back at Anduin. Blizzard just needs to add a sudden twist that retcons the fact that she was defending her people, and introduce some newfound deity that had promised her Superpowers in exchange for her absolute loyalty and the heads of a thousand dead orc orphans, or whatever.

No, i do not.

Have you been around Maldraxxus lately? Have you seen what both factions do to enemy third parties on a daily basis?

Glad to know that.
Fortunately, that hasn’t been the case for Sylvanas neither.

Thats because we have inner monologues in which she clarifies such as being the case.
You would’ve known if you had informed yourself beyond the usual, and biased stance of the recurrent Sylvanas Hate Mob.

Well, to be fair, you do try to “inform” yourself. If only to grasp at your own interpretation of stuff like:

Which apparently serves to define the entirety of a character, out of some vague interpretation of some words (you know Alleria calls Void Elves arrows too, right? It seems to be standard Windrunner speech for soldiers under them), but couldn’t care enough to check on 200 page novels that expand deeper into her feelings.
And contradict your stance about her not caring for them.

Want me to quote said bits to prove further just how wrong you are?

She indeed does. Initially.
She also tries to avoid the deaths of her nephews, sees it as an act of mercy, and fully pardons/understands her reaction later on in a comic.

Again, grasping at whatever act you can find and bringing it out of context does wonders if you have blinders thick as a wall. Not as effective in order to sell on a logical/natural character progression.

Turalyon tortured an orc, and then did the same with a mother in front of her child.
Tyrande was willing to sacrifce the entire Nightborne rebel faction as fodder in order to take Suramar. And then took on a dark power willingly.

Guess that would be enough to turn him them into villains, right? No other context needed.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

The Article itself has links to the Q&A that clarifies such. As well as the Wowpedia link for the Jailer that tackles the Valkyr deal.

God, you can’t be any more obvious in how you are now grasping at anything.

Like, mate, its known that Blizzard had to retcon Sylvanas. There is no doubt about it.

Here, take if you wish the MMO transcript. Literally wrote down all the Q&A:

https://www.mmo-champion.com/content/8823-BlizzCon-2019-World-of-Warcraft-Q-A-Panel-Recap

Q: Did the Jailer see Sylvanas as a threat?
A: We will find out during the story that Sylvanas’s dealings with the Jailer started when she threw herself off of Icecrown in Edge of Night. She helped Varian in Legion as a way to thrust herself into a position of power.

The second bit is yet another retcon. In the novel we also have the bits where she has an inner monologue that expresses how affected she was regarding Vol’jins AND Varians sacrifice, how she DIDN’T want to be Warchief, and how she blames the LOA for appointing her as such.

The paragraph above, on itself, tears down the very premise behind the overarching plot of both BfA and SL. Like, to the absolute ground.

Want a quote on that too? Its from Before the Storm.

No.
I’m explaining how the mere act of not being willing to follow certain orders, isn’t on itself an indicative of being a villain.

No…
We already had a plot around Tyrande in Valsharah and Suramar.
We also had one regarding Malfurion in Cataclysm.
We had again another one in BfA in Darkshore.
And we have yet another one in Ardenweald.

I know that you just keep grasping at whatever, but if you want i’ll spell it out simpler if only to make it dificult for you to act disingenous: It was a narrative arch that gave them a distinctive additional customisation option with heavy lore implications.
And happened exclusively, and only, for them and nobody else.

No.

The story is being ruined for the Forsaken because its demonising and rejecting core traits that made up a big chunk of their racial appeal for players.
And throwing under the bus, both representatives these players had grown attached to, and the exponents that could’ve continued the traits that had defined the race.

Because the losses they had, compared to the ones Orcs or Forsaken had, are on a whole different scale.

Night Elves went through a major narrative loss that Worgen, Gnomes, Blood Elves, Maghar, Tauren, Draenei, and almost every other race, had gone through at some point. (I’d argue that the Maghar losing the entirety of their planet was a bigger one, but you don’t really care, right? They are orcs after all.)
How exactly was it handled on a story level? As a way to further several aspects of their story, prop their protagonists to major roles in the overarching plot, and without severely harming the basic traits that make up the race (in fact, it accentuated stuff like their savagery, and their bond with nature through Ardenweald).

Now, how was the villain batting of Garrosh and Sylvanas go for Orcs and Forsaken? They suffered a similar disaster as the Night elves, Gnomes, et al…BUT, it was also accompanied by a thorough removal and condemning of the core values that made up either race.
Are you proud to be an orc that values strength? Nope, we are going to kill off said foundation by crapping on the legacy of the entire faction and proclaiming that the only time they behave “apropriately” is when they do so under an Human-influenced outlier.
We even went back in time in order to crap even more over their legacy as a species.
To the above, we also add the systemic removal of every major narrative driver that could’ve pushed the race lore forward: Nazgrim, Zaela, Garrosh,…

What relevant characters are left in order to push whatever story is left after said disaster swept over their race?
With the Forsaken, we have the exact same scenario: the major loss accompanied by the systemic removal or rejection of every core value the race had been having up until then.
And of course, the villain batting and killing of the protagonist characters that could’ve served to push their story forth.
In their case, it becomes even more alienating, as they are presented with characters that either act anathema to their previous characterisation (Calia), or are forced B-liners with close to zero actual development and minuscule ties with the actual faction (Voss).

I know both these texts will fly waaaay past you. But well, had some free time and felt like expanding.

TLDR: No, the losses aren’t even comparable.
NEs loss was that of some vague population number in a setting that has never cared about population, whereas the Forsaken one specifically aimed at crippling them narratively by shooting at the very core of what had defined them up until now.

Sarcasm is a much healthier approach than your apparent inferiority complex that urges you to condone obvious bad storytelling if only for the sake of lashing out at a fictional character.
But do not worry, i’ll be there when said story approach swings back, and hits other characters.

See ya in the next “Why did Blizzard Villain bat Tyrande/Turalyon/Velen/Anduin?! They sure hate Night elves/Humans/Draenei!!” thread.

1 Like

Lmao noble Genn? You Alliance fanboys are delusional. I hope your favorite characters dies next.

Gosh I hate quote wars.

i dunno, i personally like seeing the duel of arguments, only to be responded with a:

“no.”

It just that they always remind me of my werewolf-playing days and I’d get into quotewars with townies as scum and win games.

1 Like

Again you mentioned races and their loses that were never shown in game. You talking about a loses of a small Maghar tribe that lose a planet. But did they? What really have happened?
Some of Maghar joined the army of the Light. Others came to Azeroth. That is it. We did not see a genocide of the entire race.
Blood elves or Gnomes? Gnomes loses were never shown in game at all. We started the WoW whit a fact that that have happened once. Same thing with blood elves (who still have a capital city).

All those stories have happened before WoW. Before WoW Night Elves have also lost much. Like entire Empire in the War of the Ancients. Many other loses during the war of sands, war with satyrs, and Warcraft 3 war, when Night Elves have lost their immortality.


But that was before WoW. Those were different books and different games. In WoW, players have played for 14 years as Night Elves before BfA. People started to love Night Elves the way they were. Night Elves that are living in their Sacred Forest, cares about Nature, loves Elune, and are best in ambushes e.t.c with their experienced sentinels army.

In BfA, Alliance had to experience a second pre-patch with a lose to the Horde. Night Elves, had to suffer a defeat of the entire race in game.
All Night Elves lands and cities were conquered by the Horde. Sentinels were ambushed and defeated in their own forests. Orcs and Elves were fighting for Warsong for 14 years, and finally Orcs have won.
And finally, their Sacred Forest were desecrated.

So, Night Elves had to suffer not just a defeat, it was also a humiliation. First time in WoW game history, one playable race was fully defeated by separate faction.
Additional interesting fact, is that even those dancing trolls (that were defeated by Night Elves back in Cata), have returned to kill last elves there, and retake lands…


That is the point. Other races had some similar loses, but they were behind the scene. Blizzard did not point drama about that. Heck, Forsakens managed for example even evacuate all civilians from Lordaeron, while Night Elves have lost almost entire civilization on Teldrassil. Blizzard specially pointed that Drama in books, with a stories about dying mothers with child on hands e.t.c. And all those vids, where dying sentinels were reaching their hands to the Burning Teldrassil.

And that picture, picture where Sylvanas standing and watching how defeated Night Elves are dying with a smile on her face. How many people made that poster as their background on a laptop? How many salutes from the Horde fans were on a Blizzcone when Blizzard pointed that poster out?
You know what Night Elves had to feel at those moments? Humiliation…
And how many such poster Alliance can show, about defeated Horde races? ? ?


As for the identity change. For 14 years of the game Night Elves was a strong race that lives in the forest, cares about nature and balance. Believes and loves the Elune. Has a good relationship with the Alliance. Calling Kalimdor and their country home.

After BfA, Night Elves have lost everything. Lands, people, army, knowing that all of them went to suffer into the Maw.
Many of them started to hate Elune. Many of them started to hate even their own race and have Joined the Horde (another humiliation, how many Horde races joined the Alliance, after defeat?). I’m still burning when some one reminds me about that Night Elf Warden, the guardian of the Orgrimmar, in Baine quest line.
Night Elves started to live on the streets of Stormwind growing pumpkins (even more humiliation), kicked out of Kalimdor.

And finally Night Elves have lost their identity. They turned to the Dark Side of the Elune doing dark rituals, and became a race that lives for one reason - revenge.
In other words, Horde managed to brake the spirit of the Night Elves, forced them to the Dark Side. Knowing that it was the Horde who managed to broke a race, makes it even more humiliation.
Additionally relationships with Alliance broken.


In Shadowlands I agree, we managed to at least save some elves from the Maw. That was enjoyable. But one thing have happened here. Blizzard showed that Night Elves religion is a lie. Dead Night Elves are not going into the stars to their Goddess. Night Elves was a race related to Nature and Balance. How many topics about Night Elves druids, or their relationship with nature were pointed out in Ardenweald?
It seams that for Blizzard Night Elves are now dark eyed Elves with Bows that hunger for revenge only.
And the state of our leader still is unknown. Will she become crazy monster, or we will manage to rescue her?

2 Likes

Zandalari experienced a similar past loss as Night elves.
Blood elves experienced such in the RTS.
Worgen experienced such in Cataclysm, during the MMO.
Maghar experienced such by the time of BFA (Yes, they lost an entire planet to their enemies and had to flee their own timeline to survive).

And of course Night elves lost Teldrassil in BfA too.

None of said losses are comparable to those that specifically have as target a narrative theme. They are events designed to build a story, as tragic as it’s supposed to be.
Blizzard loves a good comeback.
And in the Night elves case, they made it certain that they had the means to recuperate on a narrative level, as all the races above:

None of the staple Night elf traits were harmed or endangered. In fact, this served to double on their original take by doubling on traits that had lost since their first introduction as playable in Wc3.
None of their narrative drivers have been harmed in any way. They still have Malfurion, Tyrande, Broll, Shandris, Maiev, Jarod, Mordent, and every known character they ever had.

In essence, their loss was a population one, in a setting that has NEVER cared about population number as a factor that could hamper narrative development.
And thanks to it, they’ve had staple relevance in the stories that followed.

You are complaining because of an event every other race suffered at one time or another, and one that far from crippling them narratively, the only thing that did was to give them even more reasons to be at the forefront of the story.

Wrong.

You’ll have to learn to deal with it as every other race I named did.
As Worgen, Gnomes, Draenei, Maghar, Zandalari, Darkspear, Tauren, and Blood elves did.

All of which, kickstart their stories with monumental losses.
All of which, start with a “near extinc” status that served as catalyst to develop their racial narratives.

And, if you want to make a point in a story discussion beyond lamenting how they’ve shattered some preconceived power fantasy, you’ll have to also learn to cope with the fact that there is a difference between using tragedy to foster narrative development (as the races above and Night elves had), and the mishandled destruction of narrative elements through the sort of villain batting the Forsaken and Orcs had.

1 Like

name one playable race and its religion that did and benefitted from it?

ill accept if its the loa, but then ill also accept a certain bear and dragon for the NE’s too.

1 Like

Well Shadowlands’ universal take on what the afterlife looks like does badly hurt the world building anyway. Up until now it was safe to say that every single religion in Warcraft was true. They’ll have to do something about it and fix that mess at some point.

1 Like

Before I reply, let me make this clear: I am not a Sylvanas loyalist. I am a Honorable Horde player and I don’t stand for Saurfang actions as well, in fact I hate everything about BFA.

I hate them so much at this point I refuse to fund anything related to their work, that includes the expansions pack.
I would rather level up my HoA for ever in BFA, just because this is the expansion that offers me the highest gear atm without having to purchase a new expansion.

I used to only read the in game lore, but BFA made me care about the outside lore in a very negative way. Almost like someone at Activision-Blizzard wanted to get special attention.

With the current people im charge ?
In my opinion, that’s never going to happen.

Agree.
Even though I never liked her, I understand players have different tastes.
If you want to play a more ambigous faction that currently doesn’t exist.
Even Warcraft RTS was more diverse than what we currently have, in terms of morals.

Warcraft 1 and 2: Good guys and bad guys.
Warcraft 3: 4 factions.

Warcraft is a chaotic world and I belive that Blizzard would close their offices first before any of us would see anything that would resemble a peace treaty.
But every player is invested in their race/faction and the game should not tell them they should feel bad for their specific choice or made them feel like they are helpless victims with no ways to protect their people.

To make this clear: I would had been perfectly fine with Alliance crimes being commited during BFA as a retaliation for Teldrassil.
The Alliance players would be told they are avenging their fallen, the Horde players would be told that they either fight now, no matter beliefs or there will be no faction to return the next day.
But that never happened.

Ironicaly I wouldn’t even be rambling about the lore if my 1st Warchief in World of Warcraft had been Blackhand. Because the narrative would had established for me since day one that Thrall was the exception not the rule. But yet the Hordes narrative had: Cairne, Vol’Jin, Baine, Rokhan. Characters that would not stand for a chaotic Horde.
An example of a game that does it better than WoW is Star Wars: The Old Republic.

Agree.
This 2 cinematics just ended it for me.

This one is totally missleading, you are actually led to belive that Sylvanas actually cares about the Horde and wants to avenge Vol’Jin death.

This is where she throws her well executed plan because of … reasons … she is serving the …

… (SL somes) jailer …

Maybe in 10 years will finaly have the entire picture.

At this point I just create headcanons for my characters and ignore everything.
My characters start at Zuldazar helping King Rastakhan but they never participated in the WoT, War Campaing.
They are just chiling with Magni and Wrathion, if they ever get back to the Horde they would be court martialed.

Honestly I support your decison 100%.
I wish I could do the same, but currently WoW is the only game I play and I am far too invested in my characters atm.

P.s. I believe Sylvanas won’t be killed.
Why ?
Because she isn’t a male character.
Garrosh, Kael’thas, just to guive a example, would be killed and their heads would be paraded in public had they been responsible for the same actions as she did.
And ultimately this is what I believe that’s what so detrimental about her character: the lack of accountability for her actions, which ultimately transpires to the rest of the Horde.

In the end there can be no peace, but at the same time there can be no conclusion to this conflict, because that would mean Activision-Blizzard would have to kill their precious golden egg chicken.

Cheers.

4 Likes

I didn’t know Dazal’alor was burned to the ground with its surrounding villages, unusable for the players these days.

I didn’t know that Quel’thalas was burned to the ground, unable to be rebuild by the blood elves!

Worgen got it worse they lost their homeland, then the land where they were welcomed as refugees. Only good thing is that no worgen died during the Burning of Teldrassil.

Unconfirmed. When the player leaves Draenor with Geya’rah and her mag’har, the Iron Horde still has forces, bases and fortresses in Gorgrond and Frostfire Ridge (which presumably was entirelly under Iron Horde control). It was even said that Draka led the mag’har forces in Frostfire Ridge while Grommash led those in Gorgrond.

What forefront? They got to talk big to Anduin, “win” one zone back (of the four they lost), be betrayed by the Alliance and in the next patch Tyrande sleeps so she doesn’t fight the person who caused all of her people’s suffering.

It’s Azshara all over again, Jaina taking the role that should go to either Tyrande or Genn (or both). Jaina suffered the least at the hands of Sylvanas, Genn, Tyrande even Anduin suffered way more.

(Same with Thrall, admittedly).

Right, which other playable race in WoW has lost its capital, the surrounded zones, and all their mainland territory?

Night elves first lost Azshara, then Ashenvale, then Darkshore and then their entire starter zone was burned down.

The Forsaken lost Lordaeron City and Brill, but they still have their starting zone, Silverpine, large parts of Hillsbrad and Andorhall (and maybe even Alterac if the BfA mission table is legit).

Worgen lost just as much as the night elves, honestly. If not more.

Gnomes lost their city, but they always shared an entire nation with the dwarves. They gained Mechagon and through their connection with the dwarves you could say they even gained Shadowforge and Aerie Peak.

Draenei have never been in a better position, they fulfilled their ultimate goal, recruited the Army of the Light and have three islands for themselves and their Stillpine allies.

We do not know if the mag’har lost their world, they went to Azeroth willingly, last we know is that the mag’har were still fighting a decades long war over Draenor.

Zandalari and Darkspear only lost their previous leader, Dazar’alor was damaged in both an invasion and civil war but it was not permanently destroyed and burned down. Darkspear have been in the best place they could get as a minor tribe, they are exalted above other tribes by the Zandalari who gave their Speakers their own building to work from and even interred Vol’jin’s urn in the same crypt where all Zandalari leaders are interred.

Tauren too have only gained since vanilla WoW, the only big losses they had where Taurajo (justified) and Cairne (internal Horde dispute). Heck, with Shadowlands it seems like Baine and Mayla are a thing, so the tauren will probably be united with the Highmountain as one people.

Blood elves didn’t even lose that much. The Isle of Quel’danas and the Holy/Arcane Sunwell is firmly under their control after the Shattered Sun did the heavy lifting. Their capital city was rebuild overnight, they have a intelligent and honourable Regent-Lord (who should be King) who is a thing with First Arcanist Thalyssra of Suramar. After TBC the surviving Sunfury rejoined their people, they were able to acquire a new type of (blood) golem, they refounded new organisations and are able to (alone) defend their new/old border. Oh, and their bananadoriel works again, making Quel’thalas nearly untakeable. (If only Blizzard would update Quel’thalas and Azuremyst :sob:)

None, except maybe trolls, but Ardenwaeld should’ve been the Emerald Dream and Bastion should’ve been Paradise.

Sure, if we rename Ardenwaeld to the Emerald Dream and the Heart of the Forest into G’hanir.

According to pre-Shadowlands lore all Wild Gods and Children of Nature and flying creatures would pass to the Dream after their death.

2 Likes

OP, I honestly don’t know what you expected to happen. There’s only so much evil stuff that a character can perform before they inevitably have to face the consequences.

The writers had multiple opportunities to take Sylvanas down a different road. They didn’t. Now she’s been written into a corner. Whether that was a good or a bad decision is of no concern to me. It’s what the writers went with, and now there will be consequences.

1 Like

I did say…

and according to this updated lore, all Loa and Wild Gods seem to have taken a right turn into Ardenweald.

you can’t just say “yeah loa lol” and then at the same time “nah, the other wild gods and elune dont count”. especially when there is definitely evidence of the latter.

Forsakens experience worse lost than NE.

  1. They lost identity.
  2. They lost faction leader.
  3. They lost home town.
  4. They currently don’t have future.
  5. They are broken and can’t be repaired back to their normal. Only something new can fix them as per writers decision.

NE have everything in tact, except World Tree, but Mount Hyjal.

I am not sure, how easy writers vanish Sylvanas-forsaken connection. It was OK for me to cut it horde wise, but forsaken connection was heartbroken for me. It’s like loose of Tyrande as NE. No matter who will be next, NE will not be the same again.

Forsakens are the worst race at the moment and in WoW history /in my vision/. Even, that trolls were two expansions leaderless too. That’s how writers love horde side. They can’t make parallel stories to move wow story for all around.

3 Likes

why can’t we just agree that most of the races in wow have been screwed in some way or another.

why must there always be “who got screwed over the worst” contest as if there was some prize at the end of the door.

1 Like

I was talking in the context of ancient times to put a series of events par on whatever happened with Night Elves in the War of the Ancients.

You can go check it live in the game.

In fact, Blizzard put some extra care in drawing plenty of parallels regarding both incidents.

The fact that the entire playable faction is made up by refugees forced to quit the planet, is enough to match (and surpass), the loss of another playable race that still counts with land across the planet, a sizeable chunk of their military, and enough strength to have recently claimed another World Tree for their own.

Regardless of how much people try to downplay it, fact is that they played a huge role in the War Effort (cinematic included), had an entire questline dedicated to their plea, development for their characters in the overarching plot (be it by clashing with Anduin, or jumping directly into Shadowlands as a notable plot to be considered), and heavy narrative ties with 1 out of the 4 main campaigns of the current expansion.

Yes, that counts as being at the forefront of the story when compared to the treatment other races had.

Only humans beat them under the spotlight as of now. And that still makes 2º out of 14.

Worgen. Darkspear. Draenei. Mag’har.

Keep reading this fallacy over and over again, and yet i can’t recall a single notable Night Elf settlement in said zone.

This example, along all the rest where you basically argue that “They eventually recovered”, further proves my point.

Most races faced at some point a major loss. Thing is, that given they preserved several of their core narrative drives (characters, protagonists, themes, motives, etc.), they eventually had the development required to recover spectacularly in some cases.

The entire reason as to why the Tauren became so instrinsically tied with the Horde, lays in the fact that they initially faced impossible odds and a devastating blow.
Same with Gnomes. Same with Darkspear. Same with Blood elves, and same with the Mag’har.

As I said, there are losses that build narrative, and other that destroy it.

The Forsaken one does the latter (as evidenced in their current lack of involvement in the story). The Night elf one, does the former (as evidenced in the current events in Ardenweald).

1 Like

Because the alliance races don’t have same fate as horde races. And because what is true, like forsakens, can’t be ignored.

People cry a lot for NE, but forsakens are in worse state and have a need to be in spotlight and development as they are down in the hole right now.

1 Like

Look at this cuck hyping the trash Horde. Listen Up. Losing a leader is much worse then losing a bunch of No name NPCs. Alliance is priviliged and you should stop complaining about things that aren’t real problems.

1 Like