Woah, that was quite a long read!
To summarize mostly, it still lacks the actual fact of acceptance into Alliance or issuing a permit to them. Although, it feels rather iffy whether (for example me or other guards) if we should straight out ignore those RPers in SW or not. I say ignore but I don’t mean literal /ignore function, just saying.
I think the so far working formula was and is: Darkfallen RPers can enter the city as they wish, with a back thought of: “People will hate me, the Darkfallen, for my previous deeds and their historical experience / background with my kin. These people can attack me too.” so technically, it’s a “racism” situation here, just IC and towards characters. And even so, when a Darkfallen accepts this trail of thought, they weight this decision to enter SW where at first day, week, month, year - majority will not tolerate their presence.
On the other hand, TKF took a stance that all Darkfallen incidents are to be reported to any Ebon Blade representative. It gives more reason for DK RPers be in the city (hunting Darkfallen as technically, they are undead rogues right now, right? Right?) and offer a sort of consequences/opportunity to the said Darkfallen.
There was recently a case where an Ebon Blade knight was brought to a detained Darkfallen and a result, I saw yesterday that Darkfallen who was wearing ‘Ebon Blade’ sigil on her chest for everyone to see. Honestly, it’s great when roleplayers adhere to this sort of RP.
But if Darkfallen godemote or think that some random embassy paper is sufficient enough, without having any background lore to support it, or just strife off from it and simply walk around to have a cup of mead at the inn - those I’d question.
So it gives a fair chance to see who is actually a good RPer that follows consequences and accepts things from the one who denies it all.