#FreeTheTransmogs
Whats the point of saving “Class fantasy” When the game make no sense
i saw a warrior (WARRIORS BTW) dwarf wearing skirt and rainbow poop stuff
- MAKE SENSE
- Remove armor restrictions
- let me be the bee that i wanna be
#FreeTheTransmogs
19 Likes
No thanks, restrictions can be good. “X class can only wear X armour” is a very good restriction.
5 Likes
Warrior can literally equip any armor type….
3 Likes
A priest dont wear plate or its called a paladin
A rogue dont wear plate because a rogue move quietly with agility
2 Likes
If that is hard to grasp I’d suggest you to play ESO, that has close to nil class fantasy.
We’re already gotten closer and closer to getting rid of it in WoW too, which is going to end up terrible. Mark my word.
Besides, the official lore is that warriors can utilize every weapon, and equipment, in game.
1 Like
So explain why priest can wear lion heritage transmog?
Thats why everyone can wear hello kitty tmog, also pajamas? Also heritage armors tend to go one of the 4 types, still all class of that race can wear it.
1 Like
I just want blizz to let us mog 2 handers into 1 handers or daggers into swords so my rogue can have some damn variety, i dislike outlaw but love having 2 swords.
3 Likes
Would like to tmog my 1 handers to 2h weapons.
2 Likes
+1
I would also like a “dont show weapons” mogs.
ALSO:
https://www.wowhead.com/news/new-chain-mail-bikinis-datamined-in-patch-10-0-5-ptr-330598
WHERE ARE MY CHAINMAIL BIKINIS ! And not just the top part. I want the bottom part too !
3 Likes
We have heritage armours for that.
i agree im all for customazation and freedome.
sorry for grammar
yes please.
Since other some armors had cool troll’s style. But like only cloth, leather and plate.
My hunter is use mail. I wanted use this mog. Need remove restrictions yeah
‘rainbow poop stuff’? Never heard of that transmog before. Sounds interesting.
What was it REALLY?
But yes, I agree with this.
I think only class tier sets should remain limited.
Hear hear.
Class fantasy makes no sense far too often to justify the restrictions. The most notorious example is the Vault of the Incarnates with its 13 shaman-styled sets that seem to be distributed in a random fashion, but even aside from that there’s many themes that fit more than one class or even role. For example, the difference between an affliction warlock and a shadow priest lore-wise is dangerously thin, especially since both types have access to both Shadow and Void abilities (yes, summoning voidwalkers counts). The amount of cloth and leather sets that should be logic-wise put into the civillian clothes available for everyone is also ridiculous, the most recent example being the tuskarr-styled fur garbs that are for some reason classified as leather despite the caps made in the same style being non-restricted. And I won’t even start with the immaculate class fantasy of a half-naked death knight smiting the enemies with two mighty fishes or onion stalks. We’re at the point where the restrictions help no one and nothing, and thus should be removed forever.
I thought this was going to be about removing transmog costs! Disappointed.
6 Likes
This should also happen!
But mainly I just want to be able to wear leather as a hunter.
To me it makes all the sense.
3 Likes
yes or cloth as paladin. no im not joking.