Yet, hereās the kicker. Itās not my text. Youāll then have to argue that the decided upon database for information about World of Warcraft and its mythos is to blame. Or its contributors and writers, regarding these details.
Agreed?
Itās not Sahaan Wiki, correct? Itās not my source, I didnāt add it.
Itās Warcraft Wiki. And its main page featuring the High Elf.
So, again I ask:
Why wonāt you give me an answer to the question? Any of you?
While many of us are presenting our opinion based on story and lore, youāre asking your question based on in-game models.
Thatās why Gilnean Human (worgen cursed) and big beefy strongmen from Kul Tiras are added as a variation of CORE HUMAN RACE, thus Allied Race.
The playable Kul Tiran have different customization than other 2 human races. But weāre speaking only about playable Kul Tirans. All over Kul Tiras you can see normal human models (cough - Derek, Katherine, Jaina) or skinny Kul Tirans (which are not part of customization option).
The present Kul Tirans settled in Kul Tiras like 2000+ years ago.
The thing is, what youāre pointing out, are the playable models. Yes, but also no - theyāre the same humans as Stormwind ones. Blizz can literally add Kul Tiran model as customization to core race Humans - because the Kul Tiran model is just one variation how do Humans look in game (btw. they made them bulkier and stronger to reflect their naval culture).
Kul Tiran, OG Humans and Gilenan (hell even the Forsaken) are all Human Race, with distinct models and visuals. Theyāre not different race, they have only different variations.
Are Quelādorei or Sinādorei distinct in any way? Blue eyes? Is Vereesa or Alleria looking different than Liadrin? Is Halduron looking different than Romath? - If your previous statement should be followed, then all new added High Elven People should be visually distinct from their Sinādorei brethren (new models, and totally different customization). Is it what HE fanatics want? - No! They want exact same copy with new name and itās only matter of time when theyāll start screaming that Silvermoon should be Alliance and Sinādorei should pack and sail off to Orgrimmar.
What you want in High Elves is the same as if anyone else was asking for Shenādralar as allied race - same model as Kaldorei but different name. That would be adding same race twice.
LF Draenei vs Draenei - we have clear evidence why theyāre as playable allied race - infused with Light - not sharing any customization, racial, mounts with Draenei.
Blood Elves were not infused with fel to the point, it would make them so distinct from High Elves, so they should be considered as different race.
Do you consider Human from Stormwind to be different race as the Human who survied Lordareon or Humans from Stromgarde?
You keep being given the answers ignore them and cry to high heaven that no one answers you. Its mental lol
You are prolific in the wiki use then search on the Alliance tab to see which races are there.
Have fun.
I for one wonāt waste another second on your shenanigans.
Youāre so strange, I feel like youāre talking to yourself 
No one will give you answer - that wouldnāt follow their narrative then.
For each of your question you will get another question.
Where? Where have you answered the question? Quote it.
Where have you stated whatās wrong on the page? What should be changed?
Plenty of people replying to me, actually. Weāre having a lively discussion.
Perhaps youāre having some connection issues?
You should ask your best friend ChatGPT all about it.
Your answers here resemble messages from a very early beta version of ChatGPT
That happens on both sides.
Iād imagine that to many people the proper use of grammar ends up looking like itās automated. Those people should pick up a book every once in a while, study some writing.
Iām really sorry this happened to you. Or glad it did - Iām not reading any of that sorry. 
Whenever somebody offers you information to the contrary from far more recent times - you trace back to citing something from 2001 from the warcraft.wiki. So weāre stuck and locked in a loop, where any presence of High Elves in the lore or world is trumped by āumm, theyāre actually dead because a 2005 forum moderator said so, along with a 2001 novelā. Did you spend any time in an academic environment - where more recent sources are better regarded?
Said the person whoās only friend is chatgpt
Are the newer and contradictory sources in the room with us right now?
If so, have they been missed by the team over at Warcraft Wiki then? My source is the main page on High Elves by Warcraft Wiki. The sources they use is on that team and their work. Iāve merely linked to it.
Feel free to provide the sources you think they should be using instead, if so.
So, again I ask ā¦
Itās a simple yes or no answer to the first question. Very easy.
Letās be friends! But first, you need to stop hating on the High Elves 
They didnāt miss anything, actually. All of the information sourced and documented on the article very nicely and with time-sensitive details of when theyāre from. You just seem to be stuck on that 2001 source and ignore anything else from that point onwards.
It seems as though you have some issue with reading and citing beyond those three sources. One of which isnāt really canon, unless you consider forum moderators as being involved with the game in a creative sense.
After you get some professional help to get over the unhealthy obsession sure.
I donāt hate high elves, but they are a bit boring to me. Itās just contrarian blood elves with a human fetish
Thatās why you only participate in threads about High Elves, as can be seen from your forum historyš¬
Whereās that source? Do you have a link somewhere? So far thereās been no links.
Because if thereās been one in the discussions, weāve certainly missed it. Iāve missed it.
Please, quote it. Iāll also send it along to Warcraft Wiki in their Discord.
So then, you are saying that the page on Warcraft Wiki is incorrect?
Do I understand you correctly? This far more recent source would then need to be introduced to the writers for Warcraft Wiki and the page changed, naturally.
When i go on the forums I lurk more unless I like or dislike something enough to participate.
In this case itās not the high elves I have a problem with, itās the lunatic fans that throw temper tantrums when being told no
Itās not as if Blizzard keeps up a constant dialogue on the use of Alliance High Elves you know. The statements we have on them are vastly more than some ever get on their own topics of interest.
You are continually attacking the use of sources on the grounds of age and have repeated this for several replies in a row. I have to conclude you feel you have stumbled across a rich and fertile vein of argument.
But in all honesty, this response is dumb. I mean, this is a really, really dumb response. Lore isnāt like milk, it doesnāt go off or curdle in the sun if you leave it out too long. It is valid until such time as it explicitly retconned.
And you attack on the Caydiem post is beyond silly. I mean, do you think she made that up on the fly? Donāt you think Metzen or someone else at the time may have objected to a moderator taking it upon themselves to begin shaping the lore? I mean look what happened to Tseric after he snapped on the forums, he was gone within days, and this would be much worse if she were making stuff up.
Perhapsā¦and admittedly this is wild speculation but bear with me hereā¦perhaps Caydiem ASKED someone with the authority to make that decision before she made that post. Because that is logically what would have happened at the time.
So let us get the following sorted, shall we?
Any lore post from any Blizzard employee is a valid source UNTIL it is explicitly retconned by a future lore source. They donāt have expiry dates, so even if the post were written in 1981 it would still be valid, and this particular post has not been retconned.
I get that it is frustrating for you that you have zero sources yourself to cite, but that is simply the nature of the argument.