That’s right.
maybe i should demand too then. crying sure made things happen before.
Don’t try to argue on this forum, especially regarding the hunter, you have invoked the worst toxic scoundrels on the forum who are only there for the pleasure of contradicting. They will give you (this is already the case) bogus arguments, lame analogies and you will just get tired of responding to them.
Fortunately, or unfortunately Blizzard is not interested in this forum so no matter what is said, proposed, criticized, requested, it will remain a dead letter.
1 Like
That’s just what it’s like debating anything on the internet. With that said: nerf hunters. Why? Because.
Exactly, I know it well. The hardest part is trying not to respond when you read endless nonsense.
noticing that yea. weird they arent smarter really. its like talking to children.
The irony is great here.
But please, do proceed telling people how Hunters should have a god given right to be no.1 DPS.
arguing actual points is hard, ey? so ure left with replies like that. sad rly. deep down, irl, u know that.
I did, you just went on and said “nope”. That’s it.
So, what’s the point arguing further? Might as well go ahead and make a blog.
And why aren’t hunters allowed to be 1st in DPS? Can you explain it to me? Why should this god given right go to warriors and rogues?
When I say, your arguments are bogus.
There is a difference between “allowed” and the entitled “should” in the OP’s initial post.
The initial claim that Hunters must be no.1 DPS because they are pure, stands neither the challenge of reality (given the Warriors, non-pure were topping for 4 years of Classic and year and a half of Vanilla) and neither the challenge of logic, given Hunters are quite a low risk DPS in raids.
My point is simple - in no way or shape, Hunters “should” be tuned to be top DPS, simply because they don’t have any risks attached to them in raids. They are BOTH ranged AND have the overall best threat drop in the game, period.
It does not mean they should be trash, but on a totem pole of who “should” be hard tuned to be a top dog - Hunters just ain’t cutting it in my book.
Practically, what happened is that there was a claim without warrant by the OP in the opening sentence, and then the whole subsequent thesis was built around this claim.
“Given the gospel truth of Hunters should be a complete top DPS - here’s what needs to be done to make happen”. You see the issue here?
where. bs.
blog is a good idea. thats a monlogue, so u can just spout stuff and disregard any argument. ure a natural at it - go ahead
lol, what are u? the wow fascist leader? learn english. really.
false.
Hunter has higher risk than warrior in raids. whenever the melee has a risk of damage, the hunters pet will suffer more, and get less/no heals. warrior will be spamhealed. so the risk of loosing part/whole character is lower for warrior.
and, the warrior has the abillity to avoid it, by NOT pulling aggro.
in addition to worrying abt pet and melee damage, hunter also has to worry about ranged avoidance of damage.
You are right. When I saw who was responding here, I just thought, “Poor, poor OP” and did not even bother to read that.
Don’t waste time arguing with them, OP. Do yourself a favor.
yea, fair point, but im boored, and they are making my point by highlighting the weakness of the counterarguments. i find them useful morons for now.
I mean, what kind of weakness you highlighted?
“Just watch threat 4head”? That is your strong counterargument?
try again. this time, quote me, it helps. if u try to rememeber it, ull just misquote me, and not get a proper reply.
thats how u end up looking less intelligent.
Okay here’s the quote.
What now?
is reading a chore u skip?
So, you claim here that a Hunter has a higher risk than Warriors in raid because pet may die, as opposed to Warrior itself who may die?
In a world of Prayer of Mending and Wild Growth, pets are plenty passively healed and on top of it they now scale with stamina and a lot at that and then another 20% on top.
Hence, in reality of SoD this issue is even less pronounced. On the other hand - the threat problems for melee and ranged without threat drops are exacerbated by increased output.
Even besides the above points - the risk severity here is not even close to being equal, because if Warrior pulls threat - he’s likely dead and gone.
If pet dies, you can rez it at some dps loss. And then, quite frankly - invoking your own style of arguing, if you let your pet die then guess it’s a “skill issue”, eh?
yes, it is. if its dumb enuff to pull aggro. thankfully, pets dont watch dpsmeters. if the mechanics are so that aoe will nuke the melee grp (the only actual risk to them if they are halfdecent players) then pets die, as mend pet is too weak, unless theres a decent healer there, or it catches an aoe heal.
so not skillbased.
u seem convinced that pulling aggro is a valid playstyle. i can only guess at what sort of gamer u are.
edit: do u secretly agree with me, and the trolling is just to bump the post so its more visible? thx then:)