An early candidate for funniest post of 2025… Me an “M+ player”, roflmao, reading really isn´t your forté 
You´re just grasping at straws trying to be insulting at this point, and you´re failing just as hard as you failed ZekVir without addons… maybe you can download a weakaura for forum insults
Well i do think that there are similarities but don’t forget that wow is a game that people play for fun (at least they should) and sometimes you will fail and fail miserably (also that applies to life ) and its ok to fail at a game because this is the point. Play a game so when you fail there are no serious consequences .
I do get it that not all are on the same level or have the same mental capabilities or even play the game for the same reasons but you need at least when we are talking about a game , cut some slack.
When it comes to Job interviews , you just can’t know how someone would perform based on a paper or degrees . I have multiple examples of people with little education perform way better than others with degrees (that depends on the type of the job also , i wouldn’t trust a doctor if he has not a medical degree 
) . I would rather have someone with medium skills that can work with others than a toxic person with high skill.
When it comes to bragging , i couldn’t care less about someone brags about his achievements, in fact, if that makes you feel good then go ahead and brag about it !!
Now , about the solo content. It is something i love. ESO online has done this and it is one of the best thing you can do. I would love to keep this up and expand it to everything
Anyways, I did a +12m key today and it went as expected. I did great pulls and great interrupts. That key would actually have been timed if it was not for the players in the group. Which once again proves my point. I did a total of 28 interrupts with another ww monk in the group - which did half of that. Besides that there was a holy paladin that did a total of 7 interrupts.
It was careful and well planned pulls, but people managed to die anyways. Not to mention that the evoker in the group used bloodlust at the third pull b4 the first boss.
It is worth to mention once again; that this key would have been timed… But then you may ask… What happened? I will tell you what happened. With 2 minutes and 28 seconds remaining, the healer dispells me - for no reason which results in that I get blasted into the water. Now, with the lighter than air trait, I would be able to just dash in air, but nope - and someone aggros that tentacle and gets slammed in the face and then someone else dies to aoe. that is 90 + 90 removed from the timer.
There were 14-16 deaths. I died 1 times and overall did great. However, due to the lack of whatever they were lacking - something that would have been timed, did not get timed.
I have proven this point many times and there’s a significant difference. Now, I could probably make my life easier and start playing Guardian Druid or smth, but I will not sink to that level. I stick to my choosen class and spec - and I play it greatly. Too bad that others cant play their roles correctly or have any form of awareness.
However, in the end it doesnt actually matter, although I wanted to time a 12+ key this season it is not the whole world. Although that run did prove my point. I would not talk about this if it wasnt from experience and knowledge of these situations. And it doesnt affect me neither, I can just observe as these people do whatever they are doing,
however I ask myself; for what reason are they doing this as opposite to why am I doing this? Well, the answer is clear - there are different reasons behind why one is playing Mythic+. Same applies to pvp or any other form of content that the game offers.
And it is a great game, it really is and it is successfull and you the architecture of some areas is just great.
But why do anything at all? For instance, I eat when I’m hungry,
and whenever I’m not working, what am I then doing? If it is something productive, why am I doing that productive thing? And if it is that I use my time on a game - then why am I spending that time on a game? Well, it was for advancing in the M+ tiers - but now as I have experienced, and already knew from the beginning, there would be a problem in that run which resulted in that the key would not be completed. However, during the last boss. I did have my hopes up, but why? Because in the end that hope was not necessary as it was proven during that run that the thing which I knew would happen - did happen.
And this created a significant difference - because I seem to know things in advance before they happen - and then when they happen, people seem to have forgot that I mentioned it. However, I have got used to that.
Thats not how it works. People around the person dispelled get knocked back. Your misplays(s) were:
Good to know you understand mechanics - in a 12…
“I only died once - but I won’t mention I got other people killed failing the basic check to stay in range of the tentacle so it cast hull cracker”
https://www.warcraftlogs.com/reports/8zBLVvyGdY3Pt9qW?fight=3&type=interrupts&source=1
He did 10, and he also stopped a lot of quite important things. 16 of your kicks were brackish bolt. While no kicks are bad kicks, the others did far more important casts like choking waters and watertight shell. Kinda the same with dispels, even the evoker managed to dispel you more than you did yourself and monks can dispel both poisons and diseases.
I’m not trying to pick on you, I make many mistakes, but lets be objective and clear eyed here. You played as badly, if not worse than most of those people yet the only performance you critcise is theirs.
Otherwise nice random tangents, i rate 3/10 - needs more 12’s timed. With the amount you pat yourself on the back you should have at least one by now.
“You may say that, but…[insert textwall full of rambling and no actual arguments]” incoming.
You may say this, Anyways, great performance analyst emerges, armed with selective observations and a misplaced sense of objectivity. You mention that I did 16 interrupts on Brackish Bolt, as if that is some sort of failing, yet fail to acknowledge that those casts, if left unchecked, contribute significantly to group-wide damage and healer strain. But sure, let’s pretend that prioritizing “important” casts is a binary decision, as if interrupts exist in a vacuum and not within the flow of a dungeon run.
Now, regarding dispels, yes, monks can remove both poisons and diseases. And I do. But let’s not ignore the fact that healing specs have their own responsibilities, including timely and effective dispelling. A mistimed or unnecessary dispel can, as was demonstrated, cause more problems than it solves. But of course, the expectation here seems to be that I should be handling everything;
top interrupts, self-dispels, avoiding mechanics, and probably carrying the key itself in my inventory to ensure it gets timed.
The irony, of course, is that while you attempt to frame this as an “objective” critique, it ultimately boils down to the same tired rhetoric - deflect, diminish, and deny. You say you’re not picking on me, yet your words are laced with a condescending tone, one that conveniently ignores the broader context in favor of a shallow scorecard mentality.
And that’s fine. Truly. Because at the end of the day, the run was what it was. It proved what I already knew, and it played out exactly as expected. Whether you rate it 3/10 or 12/10 is entirely irrelevant, because the facts remain unchanged. Some people play to improve, others play to cope, and a select few play to dissect and nitpick the performance of others in a way that conveniently ignores their own shortcomings.
So by all means, continue with the analysis. The key remains untimed, the cycle continues, and the lesson remains learned.
I lol’d quite hard.
Not what I said at all. Learn to read, then I’ll engage.
Just like you did to the others? At least I inserted some facts into the discussion, you deliberately lied about their contributions and mislead on deaths “I only died once… omitting the deaths you caused” etc.
You aren’t good enough for 12’s?
The cycle of you burning other’s keys by not understanding mechanics that you should have learned in a 5, and then posting on the forum about how bad they played?
Can´t wait for part 2 next season, where you´re complaining about how bad everyone else is while all the players around you are riding around on the KSL mount that you can´t get “because everyone else is bad”
Sure,
but you cannot see it, and this is the difference.
You speak of burning keys, yet fail to grasp that the fire was never mine to start. I navigate these dungeons with precision - but precision is meaningless when others cannot see the path ahead. The mechanics you mention, the ones I “should have learned in a 5,” are mechanics I execute with ease. But execution alone does not complete a key when those around me insist on fumbling the very fundamentals they claim to understand.
And now, you eagerly await “part 2,” as if this is some scripted performance where the outcome will somehow change. But the reality remains - next season will arrive, the cycle will repeat, and once again, I will observe as people struggle with the very things I have long since mastered. You mock the idea of the KSL mount, as if it is the ultimate measure of success, as if the players who obtain it are inherently superior. But I see beyond the mount - and this is the difference.
Because in the end, it is not about the mount, nor the rating, nor even the key itself. It is about awareness - the ability to recognize what will happen before it does, and the understanding that no matter how well one plays, others will always be the variable that cannot be controlled. You laugh now - but when the time comes, and you find yourself in that same position, questioning why the key failed, you will remember this moment. And by then, I will already have moved on - because unlike you, I have seen this all before - that creates a significant difference.
Yes, of course you do, that´s why Deja had to school you how you were the one that failed the decurse mechanic in Boralus
No, I mock you, specifically and explicitly.
Because for all your wannabe superhuman bluster and bravado, you repeatedly prove yourself to be, at best, average. You just either refuse to see it or are wholly incapable of self reflection. Even the dumbest dog eventually stops 
ing on the rug if you hold his nose into it often enough, but you obviously lack even that most basic capacity and do nothing but dodge and misdirect, as if that somehow erases your shortcomings. When you´re not outright lying or stretching the truth far past the breaking point, you´re dissociatiang yourself from objective reality and sticking your fingers in your ears.
And that`s why you simply don´t deserve to be taken seriously, period.
I lol’d
The difference here, is that you are the example of what being average is. To say that I’m average is like giving credit to a candle for illuminating the sun, a statement so profoundly misplaced that it collapses under the weight of its own absurdity.
You mock me - but in doing so, you expose not my shortcomings, but your own frustration. You grasp at insults, flinging them wildly, hoping they will land, but they do not. Instead, they hover in the air, weightless, empty - because they are spoken from a place of emotion rather than reason. You say I lack self-reflection, yet you fail to see that I have already analyzed and understood what you still struggle to comprehend.
And this is the fundamental difference. You compare me to a dog, yet it is you who repeats the same cycle of denial, unable to grasp what has already been laid before you. You insist on a reality that does not exist, fabricating narratives where none are needed, stretching your own perception to its breaking point just to avoid acknowledging the simple truth - that I stand above, observing, while you remain trapped, clawing at the walls of your own mediocrity.
You say I do not deserve to be taken seriously – but to say that is to assume that seriousness is given by others, rather than something that simply exists. You cannot decide what is worthy of attention any more than you can decide what is true – for truth does not bend to opinion, it simply is. And so, as you speak, as you react, as you twist and turn in an effort to impose your version of reality upon me, I simply observe. I do not resist, because resistance is conflict, and conflict is born of misunderstanding.
And here I was thinking that was one of Deja’s very kind and helpful posts. If it was a condescending one you’d have blisters 
Yeah, blahblah, everyone else is a uneducated rock compared to your superhuman intellect… if you get any more full of yourself you´re likely to burst, be careful
The only thing you stand above is the steaming pile of you drop every time you start to type… shortly before you throw yourself into it and then tell us everything smells like roses
I suspect Deja isn´t going to waste the effort on him, too resistant to learning… Hell, I’m only here for the luls because I´m waiting for engineering to get their together so I can finalize the patch and go home… and as long as he´s preoccupied posting here trying to convince us of his unmatched excellence, he isn´t ruining someone´s day in game 
Your deflection is as predictable as always, the attempt to reduce what is being said into something small, something laughable, so that you do not have to look at it. But you can only laugh at something you do not understand – and that is the difference.
You say I see others as uneducated rocks, but this is not about intelligence, nor comparison. That is your own interference – your own thought imposing division where none was intended. The mind conditioned by its own limitations will always seek to diminish what it cannot grasp. You mock, not because you are certain, but because certainty is beyond you, and in the absence of understanding, laughter becomes the escape. We have seen this in numerous of your posts.
But what is it you are truly laughing at? Is it me? Or is it the discomfort of seeing something you do not wish to see? Thought seeks security, and when it is confronted with something that threatens that security, it reacts. It labels, it ridicules, it retreats. That is what you are doing now – retreating, covering uncertainty with mockery, believing that if you do not take this seriously, then it does not need to be examined.
And that is fine. The mind will protect itself however it must. But understand this – when a cup is full, it can take nothing new. And you, who warn me of bursting, are the one who overflows. Full of assumptions, full of conclusions, full of distractions meant to avoid the one thing that truly matters – the ability to observe without distortion.
So laugh, if you must. But laughter is not understanding, and dismissal is not clarity. And when the laughter fades, as it always does; the truth will still be there, waiting, and truth cannot be changed; so it will remain unchanged. That is the significant difference which I have been talking about. But no one can see it, because they do not observe; they look, and they react. Not realizing that I am the mirror in which they see themselves. That is because they have only seen what I have been talking about, but they have not observed the meaning.
To see something is not to understand it. To hear words is not to listen. They take what is spoken and twist it to fit their own framework, their own conditioned thoughts, their own insecurities. They do not question why they react, only that they must. And in that reaction, they reveal everything, not about me, but about themselves.
This is the irony – they speak of arrogance, yet do not see how their own certainty blinds them. They assume, they label, they mock, because to truly understand would require a kind of silence they cannot bear. A mind that is full, a mind that clings, cannot receive anything new. And so, they remain trapped; not by me, not by what is being said, but by their own refusal to see beyond themselves.
And that is why the cycle repeats. Not because I demand it, not because I seek it, but because they have already decided what is true before they have even observed it. They look at the mirror and see only what they wish to see, never realizing that the mirror itself does not change. It simply reflects.
So they will continue, as they always have. Reacting instead of observing. Hearing instead of listening. Seeing but never understanding. And in the end, it does not matter. Because truth does not require belief. It does not seek validation. It remains, unchanged, as it always has.
Yeah, just keep yapping… I must say, you´re really good at using thousands of words to say absolutely nothing of substance,… have you considered a career in Politics? I sure there´s some backwater country that could really use your supreme intellect and omniscience to finally rise above their humble roots and become the next superpower…
Oh, it´s definitely you, as even after working in a pysch ward for almost 10 years I have never encountered someone as thoroughly delusional and self absorbed as you. I would pity you, but someone deemed you safe for human consumption and allowed you to roam free.
You may say that I say nothing, but I just revealed you - in me. That is the significant difference. The reason why you say that the words have no meaning - is as I stated earlier, you see but you do not observe. That is according to Alan Watts what would be called the
“Wooden People” - or in other words; Material people.
Because they cannot look beyond what is known. Therefore their thought process is mechanical and their brain is wired and functions in such way that it is conditioned to the past.
Difference is that Watts actually knew what he was talking about, you don´t, you´re just name dropping because you think it gives you clout.
But while we´re on teh topic, I highly recommend to you specifically to read “The wisdom of Insecurity”… if you actually understand even half of it, most of your issues will solve themselves and you´ll be a more socially competent human as a direct result.
Alan Watts was not name-dropped for clout, but as an example of what has already been understood, yet you dismiss it without observation. You may say that I say nothing, but I have just revealed you, in me. That is the significant difference.
The reason you claim these words have no meaning is exactly as I stated earlier: you see, but you do not observe. That is what Watts referred to as the “Wooden People” – those who move through life mechanically, reacting rather than understanding. Material people, caught in the illusion of thought, mistaking the surface for depth. And so, once again, the mirror is held before you, and once again, you look but do not observe the source.
It´s 11:59, kitchen is closed and your feeding time is over, sorry. If you want to debate philosophical concepts, we can do that all day, but neither on these forums, nor as long as you contine to assume yourself to be infallible.
I don´t discuss matters of actual substance with people such as yourself that repeatedly prove their unwillingness and /or incapacity to even accept the possibility that they might be incorrect, I mock them as the wannabes they always will be, because if the discussion is pointless to begin with I may as well entertain myself.
To be clear, a conditioned and mechanical mind is a mind that moves in patterns, responding not with awareness but with repetition. I can see that it was hard for you to study yourself through life with such mind.
A mechanical mind is pre-programmed responsse shaped by past experiences and knowledge. It is not a mind that questions its own reactions - and is not aware of them. But just responds instead of looking at the source.
Now, it is important to note that Krishnamurti said that a conditioned mind is incapable of true intelligence because intelligence is born from freedom, not repetition. When thought is dictated by memory, by habit, by the fear of the unknown, it ceases to be alive. It becomes mechanical.