I hope that you all are submitting bug reports. I know it’s easy to think that they don’t do anything, but when dark iron dwarves came there was a bug with one hairstyle on a female clipping for 2 pixels (it was so minor and only with one hairstyle). I’ve submitted a couple of bug reports and it got fixed in a couple of weeks. If we bug them about it, they will notice it without telling you on the forums.
3 Likes
I have a 165Hz IPS panel. Sue me.
EDIT: And a 300Hz one on my laptop!
1 Like
HUAWEI MateView GT 34 Inch Ultrawide Curved Gaming Monitor.
This is my monitor, and I highly recommend it.
I believe ppl were offering to pay to get it updated. He declined but went on to update
TN has more realistic colour compared to IPs. Got 75 & 144 hz TN screens and 120 + 260 hz so seen a few. TN seems to fuse together better whereas IPS is more pixel precise.
Its the most bad blizz came up with, u better adjust,.
I wish blizz could go back to old talents but, will not happen…
I been here from start and from this talent i seen, they better remove wow.
Those unqualified comments on why there’s no issue with the new UI either stemming from someone, who never played high end content at all or someone who’s just straight up ignorant towards the basics of a complex interface prove you right.
2 Likes
It used to indicate with certain effects that a skill would be forced off cooldown or when you could gain a guaranteed crit, etc, etc.
But the new UI no longer does this, as far as I’m aware.
Edit: I just read it is still supposed to do that. Another bug to add to the list, I guess.
LOL, nope. TN doesn’t have truecolor range, but much lower.
I think people are being duped with flashy deception big-time once again. (Should work great on people who also love ReShade and SmartFX.)
“Fuse together better” - you mean smearing. That’s pixel latency. Or static? Then it is interpolated. That’s all bad. Pixel precision is the good counterpart to it.
The Huawei monitor mentioned for example doesn’t say IPS on the spec sheet but VA(!) and doesn’t even mention response time, which is really a red flag. This could mean heavy overdrive and possibly even frame interpolation like they use for TV to make it more fluid. (165 Hz is 3x 55 Hz.)
300 Hz is outright silly. - Always the big numbers in marketing. Same as with cameras and megapixels. Management says jump through burning hoops to get that number up.
There has also notoriously been shenanigans with contrast numbers and artificial boosting of it, as well as with viewing angle.
And of course, monitors specifically made for gamers will have a target group based marketing and product design approach.
EDIT: You know what? Forget the Hz trickery. They might simply have added the hardware function without any practical benefit. If the more Hz just vanish in a sea of smear, it doesn’t matter, you could run it at 1000 Hz. Because, as I said, we cannot perceive differences in such ranges anyway.
I completely agree on the 300Hz but to say that I got duped is a bit rich. I had one choice if I wanted the laptop, which I did want due to many, many other aspects of it, and that was the one.
As for my desktop, I can definitely tell a big difference between 165 and 60Hz. IPS is definitely capable of 165Hz without smearing it to death, though it will smear it somewhat because IPS always does. There is no doubt that an OLED at 120Hz looks better. I still prefer the 165Hz to 60Hz, but that doesn’t mean high refresh IPS has no value.
Can’t see anyone saying that it was a IPS monitor any where. Though Ishayo said his monitor was a IPS but that was not the HUAWEI…
I have a LG 34GN850-B, and I’m extremely satisfied with it. It’s a 160hz IPS monitor. Can highly recommend it.
So you’re saying my monitor has a slow response time?
Don’t be lazy, do a bit more research.
No, stop moving the goalpost.
Obviously, there are diminishing returns that are more pronounced visually, so yeah, I agree, it gets more difficult to SEE the difference, comma, however, you can still feel the difference, the higher the Hz the more fluid the game is going to feel to you.
There is a reason why people that play First Person Shooters care so much about Hz/fps; do you honestly think that they care about how visually stunning the game looks?: No, they want their frames to be loaded before the frames of the person they are competing against.
VA should be worst in terms of response time. IPS is somewhat in the middle.
Lazy? I checked the manufacturer website’s specs and some review sites and none mentioned it. Why are YOU lazy and not pointing me to where it is mentioned?
The new UI is not a patch on some addons, but it’s a massive step up from the 18 year old UI we had before.
Thankfully this allows us the best of both worlds, those who hate addons, get a better UI after 18 years, those who use addons, can keep doing so, and generally lose nothing.
You keep trying to find something wrong with my monitor.
Now it’s my monitor response time not being fast enough and that the manufacturer is using trickery to get me 170 fps on ultra settings.
Brethren, it’s ok if you have a cheap monitor, I meant no disrespect, you’re the one that responded to me, I was responding to someone else.
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.