another reason besides the 1s i already mentioned is that switching chars wile playing takes time.
thats why i already was happy with the char limit on 1 realm being removed so i could move all my chars to 1 realm for easier access
with 2 accounts i need to not only load the realm back in but also switch account which is for a quick char swap just to transfer things very annoying with all the loading times
also 13 euro each month is manageable for me but going to 26 euro a month is a bit to much for me + the cost of the expansions again.
and i want to be able to play all my chars when i want them and not being locked out with 1 month only these chars are available and the other month the others
Actually, that is not true with 2 accounts. If you have 2 accounts you can log in with both accounts at the same time, and that make switching between chars in 2 accounts as fast as press ALT+TAB to switch from one wow exe to another.
This has been discussed in this thread already so there is no point of you just repeating this. People have explained why this is not satisfactory option.
they also said no high elfs for the alliance yet then void elfs came and then even customization with light skin and blue eyes and also said no classic wow with the infamous quote " you think you need it but you dont " and look what we got now
hate to burst your bubble but a void elfs are both high elfs and blood elfs ( if you played the introduction of the void elf you see both exiles of the sinorei ( blood elfs) and elfs from the silver covenant ( high elfs) join the cause to follow alliria and locus walker studies so yea your void elf char can be definitely be a high elf
if they for some reason start to follow Tyrande her night warrior’s ritual i don’t see why not although since there horde i dont see them to likely follow her so dunno what you want to propose with this example
I dont like this idea.
50 is more than enough. I doubt anyone actually plays all 50 if they’ve hit cap.
The reason I dont like it is it means there are less names avaliable to use for people who will actually play their character instead of play an hour or 2 once a year on alt 74
i agree that the name issue need to be addressed in general as even without the char limit removed this stays a issue over time and would like if they imply surnames into the game
that said its oke if you dont like the idea of 50 char and you definitely wont be forced to do so but why denie other peoples happiness? like i mentioned before why would you care if i got 50 or 80 chars?
also saying " I doubt anyone actually plays all 50 if they’ve hit cap " is nothing more then your own assumption
that you play as " mclovin" doesnt mean we all play like a mclovin as were all different people who like different things and play differently.
i mean if you cannot do rocket science doesn’t mean that other people cant do rocket science either.
so dont assume if you cant and or wont want to play 50 + char that other people cant or wont want to play either.
I don’t know how anyone meaningfully plays lots of characters, I have one main I do everything on and the others are either profession support and then just a load of meaningless alts I levelled for heritage or chances at the love rocket once a year. I’m reaching my char cap for this account but I’m just gonna delete some if I need to make a new one.
Yet we see people want more than 50 or run multiple accounts
like i stated in a a post above everyone play’s the game differently .
i for myself am not a hard core raider or mytic + runner and like mostly to run quest and adventure and rp with my friends and do old raid myself later when there soloble in later expansions
and over a months period its very easy to maintain 50 chars if you dont need to go out or not bound of hour long raids
got all mine 120 + at least 420+ ilvl with them all which for raiders and pvp isnt high but for world content is more then enough
so this again is just a assumption and even worse technically go’s against the spirit of your MVP terms.
“MVP is a player who has answered players’ questions consistently and accurately in the past that Blizzard gives a note of credibility to what they post. They continue to promote constructive posting wherever they can.”
this neither accurate but a assumption or constructive
surnames bro surnames is what allot of people want and even npcs in game have so it is bit silly we dont have it yet
You are the one assuming and resorting to naming my MVP status, which is frankly disappointing.
I expressed that I don’t see how people can play that many characters meaningfully, I did not state no one can possibly play that many characters meaningfully. I was very careful with my wording because I have a different playstyle to someone who is a serious altoholic.
and also said no classic wow with the infamous quote " you think you need it but you dont " and look what we got now