Who are you even arguing with at this point. Is this practice for your entrylevel political philopshy class? If so good luck with the exam.
What has PCU got to do with it anyway (another non PCU here btw).
So posters agreeing youâre posting waffle is PCU conspiracy but when that random pandarenx2 and that velf hunter nod their heads to every single post you make its because youâre posting hot takes and not because theyâre simply e-liking someone because they know theyâll oppose posters they experience criticism from.
We have a mechanisation for removing blinkers. I know a guy.
There are two sides to every issue: one side is right and the other is wrong, but the middle is always evil. The man who is wrong still retains some respect for truth, if only by accepting the responsibility of choice. But the man in the middle is the knave who blanks out the truth in order to pretend that no choice or values exist, who is willing to sit out the course of any battle, willing to cash in on the blood of the innocent or to crawl on his belly to the guilty, who dispenses justice by condemning both the robber and the robbed to jail, who solves conflicts by ordering the thinker and the fool to meet each other halfway. In any compromise between food and poison, it is only death that can win. In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit. In that transfusion of blood which drains the good to feed the evil, the compromise is the transmitting rubber tube.
t. Ayn Rand
Your point was to demean my position, so Iâd say Iâm arguing with you right now.
Iâm trying to show you where I come from, and why I donât shy away from what I said.
Quote a real philosopher then weâll talk.
Itâs easier to pretend that everyone who agrees with you is in the same faction when you donât have any arguments that donât sound like they came from cleverbot left
However Athramus is right in that you should also join the PCU
Okay, but I donât think that the Roleplay forums under the post âMalding in Stormwindâ is the place for discussing your theortical politics and applying it for RP drama completely unrelated to the thread going on.
Even if it was related I feel announcing yourself loudly as being âCentristâ is just the weak manâs defence where you sit on the fence so your position cannot be attacked. When itâs incredibly obvious you already picked a side and is weirdly only attacking the pcu people in the thread.
My computer is packed up ATM so no easy play but I was thinking of sticking my nose back in the RP game after a few months break but unsure of whether any guilds out there suit my boy here.
We have an extremely cool gnome / mechagnome joint you might like depending on your concept
Revelation 3:16
So, because you are lukewarmâneither hot nor coldâI am about to spit you out of my mouth.
â
Would you say the Holy Bible was spitting absolute + with this quote, Yue?
Pretty sure Rand is a philosopher irrespective of whether you agree with them or not. You donât get to decide that. And you have to be a pretty arrogant individual to think you can.
Irrespective or whether she wrote garbage she had a heck of a lot more clout in influencing thinking that you. So if a "non real " philosopher does that, what are you?
Oh wait, I know, an enlightened soloist who can pierce the veil nobody else can see through. Get over yourself, you sound ridiculous.
Actually love this post! Makes me want to support OOCers more firmly instead of sitting middle! I got no issue with OOCers like raiders and such who donât grief!
Also whatâs up with people using ad hominem left and right! Blizzard used to be way more trigger happy with bans!
If you bothered to read the topic, youâll notice it was a reference to another discussion, where it was an epiteth I received, rather than formulated myself. I simply said why I donât mind that, and I think itâs an enlightened position.
I respect those who just want memes and sh1tposting, but let me have fun in my own way okay? You can do your thing right below this post.
Edit.
Thereâs actually a debate about Rand - a lot of philosophers donât consider Rand a philosopher. It was a reference only a man of culture would understand.
Can I expect a summary hammered to my local church door?
(also your attempt on intellectualism is cringe, just type like a normal person)
Source please. I really wonder what philosopher would stand up and go like âlul he ainât oneâ.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwSts2s4ba4
For all her popularity, however, only a few professional philosophers have taken her work seriously. As a result, most of the serious philosophical work on Rand has appeared in non-academic, non-peer-reviewed journals, or in books, and the bibliography reflects this fact. We discuss the main reasons for her rejection by most professional philosophers in the first section.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ayn-rand/
There. One of the most trustworthy websites about philosophy. Is that good enough for you?
Now -this- is derailing.
Professional ideas guys coping as usual
What the hell is a professional philosopher! Are your ideas less important unless you get paid for them / get published! Whoâs to decide! LOL!
My pvp knowledge makes me a professional philospher.
Imagine unironically needing to appeal to the authority of Stanford Ideas Guys to ignore subjective ideas because youâre unwilling to confront the quote with your own brainpower.
cringe, honestly