WoD was peak class design for a lot of classes. I really liked the pretty much non-dot shadow priest. Enhancement shaman felt really good to play in WoD as well.
Yeah, everthing felt great cause you had lots of cool tools, you know pre pruning. Also OPness is relative, so even though everyone was very powerful, no one was OP for that same reason. I know many have problems understanding this fact, but being overpowered is always relative. Yeah takes, a bit of IQ to understand, but please try.
It´s not fair enough, people preferring WoD to MoP class design wise have no clue what makes wow good. Sorry, but ask every good pvper (or anyone else who is knowledgeble) which was best of WoD and MoP, I guarantee you almost everyone prefers MoP classes.
Yeah right, one spec. You know enhance was one of few specs that weren´t pruned. So it counts in my favor actually. It was basically MoP enhance, with 2 charges of lava lash and stormstrike.
I wouldn’t know, I barely played warlords and wasn’t around in mop
And still mop gets name dropped all the time, that’s fine, really, but it’d be better to have an actual, detailed explanation with examples on how it actually was better.
Sounds like an appeal to authority to me. Link videos discussions etc or do you just want to make some random rant and not really want to discuss anything ? I’m confused