even if i agree with you (which for the record - i do not) it will still mean nothing to the conversation as blizzard would still be actively struggling balancing and my argument regarding that would remain correct.
So what you do is strawpicking, its annoying, unintellectual and just an incorrect form of argumentation.
if the argument is that they shouldn’t create more specs because “think about balance” I fundamentally disagree with that idea and i just think it’s bad for the game.
for the balance is the worst class to play and weakest maybe i need to get to know better i try for 3 months i had decent 30% haste 25 mastery and 19 crit + weapon enchants and buffs but it dosnt seem to as good ever
Don’t you think we’ve got enough specs and classes to be getting on with as is?
I don’t think such a thing exists.
Do you ever get tired of new content? Sounds pretty stupid when you put it that way right?
It’s not my job to think about how creating a new spec could make it slightly harder for the dev to balance, and i frankly don’t care at all.
2 Likes
there is a breaking point when adding more evergreen content makes it too much.
There is a reason why most of the content that we recieve is valid only in current expansion, while classes are with us for the rest of the game’s existence
I honestly don’t know if constantly adding new classes is healthyfor the game.
Sure new content is cool, but BFA taught us that just because it’s new content, doesn’t mean people want it.
Then make better content.
For example, i didn’t like augmentation, but i don’t dislike that they tried to add a new spec.
1 Like
Sure, but even if you make every class and spec brilliantly designed, what’s the point? Why do they need to be there when we have 15 other classes that are perfectly fine?
Ever considered that just because you can do something, you shouldn’t?
But back to balancing classes, just adding more classes into the mix will eventually get too much for Blizzard. We don’t need more classes and specs, we need current ones to be improved, and that’s been my stance for some years now.
exactly good argument ! agumentation evoker might not be as my personal opinion that good spec, but there are people who enjoy it (bless them lol) and they can pull out max out of this spec.
again thats not what i said. keep going. 3th try is the charm.
what did i say ?
Because why not?
Just because you have good specs doesn’t mean that adding more good specs is bad.
Ever considered that games live and die by their content? And no new good content means declining playerbase?
This is not an option, they have to do it, or suffer the consequences. People did not like the massive 3 expansion gap between dh and evoker, people expected a new class in shadowlands, and when they didn’t get it, they were pissed. One more reason why shadowlands was not liked.
They did make covenants, maybe if that was good people wouldn’t have minded. But ultimately in legion they did both artifacts and a new class. So…
Blizzard can achieve ideal magnificence balance in World of Warcraft through a meticulous and iterative technique. By continuously monitoring gameplay data, participant remarks, and adapting to the evolving meta, the development crew can put in force sluggish modifications to every class. Regular testing, each internally and with participant communities, ensures that adjustments are thoroughly evaluated before deployment. Balancing have to prioritize each PvE and PvP aspects, acknowledging the various participant base. Transparency in communique approximately balancing choices fosters knowledge and agree with inside the participant network, in the end contributing to a balanced and fun gaming revel in for all but they do not implment it as blizz being a bit too lazy to do that one weak they boost some classes and its often same classes and same classes next week nerf - then its off to another …
They are also not alone, players are willingly testing and giving feedback, sometimes even great feedback for free.
Because they actually care about this stuff.
I like the concept but rather than new classes I would prefer new specs for each class e.g.
Warrior gladiator sword and one hand dps.
Priest dps with light rather than shadow.
Tank shaman
Either healer dk or ranged DPS dk.
Stuff like that.
Because you don’t need to add new specs or classes to improve a game.
I agree, but as you pointed out, a lot of class design isn’t great right now, so they should be focusing on that over new specs and classes.
This argument doesn’t work, because classes by and large have never been considered proper content compared to raids, dungeons, zones etc.
I think SL’s not having a new class was expected since almost no one expected to get one. Necromancer was defo thrown around a lot back then, but we already had Death Knights, so having another necromancer-style class would be redundant. We were up until that point following the WOD method (No race or class, class, race). All the leaks for DF never suggested we’d have a new race. Only the Evoker class was mentioned.
Besides, in the end, no one cared that SL’s didn’t have a new class. It is certainly not the reason why people hate Shadowlands to this day.
alright but the next class blizzard makes takes 90 % of you favorite class’s toolkit and gives you nothing in return 
you love priest well the new class ultra healer just took 90 % of your abilties and stole your class idenitiy … heck just ask the warlock players what happen when demon hunter was made
Still hurts to this day. Part of me wants to go play SOD just for the warlock tank demon form.
To be honest entire demonology identity is wannabe demon hunter when meta was introduced.
Before wotlk demo’s identity was more powerful minion, utility and soulfire crits
You can keep living in your fantasy world where they can just “not add things” and it will be fine.
That’s about all.
1 Like