iks de xddd xddkaskrkasasa
Mimimi, melees so broken, caster unplayable. Stop trolling! Specs with 20+ yards range are clearly dominating!
like ret? hehaha
show ur main please i wanna laugh
1 Like
And demo and frost mage and boomy and destro and ele.
Show your passport please, curious why you are still allowed to play and write in the european forum!
some of the worst suggestions to demo lock I’ve ever seen why reduce grimoire felguard stun by 50% when its a 2 min cd
Just ignore it, dude plays destro and sees things only from his PoV
because dawgs like u exist
Rog mage and lock are op since s1 of wow atleast one put of these 3 speccs is always.
warriors are op since 2004 atleast one put any warrior spec is op
2 Likes
not true though
5 Likes
Hahahahhaha ur the king man
He isn’t wrong though. I can only remember one patch where they weren’t top tier, and that was 5.2. But the reason they got nerfed was because they one-shot everyone in patch 5.0 and 5.1.
Warrior Zug Zug Grammar.
OP is not the same as top tier. but how would you know anyway? you’re a lvl 62 wotlk dk
Overpowered literally means they are too powerful …
And I guess you just disproved Ràkar’s point then. Because he was the one who said “OP” not me.
But okey, name a season where they didn’t end up being S-tier or at least high A-tier. Because I keep hearing about how Rogue and Mage have always been the supreme classes of pvp. But I can’t think of a time where warriors were considered average - other than in 5.2.
The difference between OP and top tier is pretty simple.
If we have for example 10 specs total, 1 of them is in S tier and the rest are between A and B tier, then the spec in S tier is clearly OP.
Now, if take those 10 specs and put 4 of them in S tier, 5 of them in A tier and 1 of them in B tier, well, now we have a situation where 4 specs are in the highest tier - but you can’t have 4 DPS specs in one team.
An example of this happening would be in IIRC SL S2, ret and warrior were both top tier specs and they would have been OP too, if it weren’t for the equally obscenely strong DH/Boomkin set up. The two ended up cancelling each other out
Okey let’s go with your point then. But this has been the same with Rogue. Rogues have predators as well. Now it is even worse because Blizzard have given (especially Sub) limited options in terms of comps. This wasn’t the case in the past, but new horrible Legion design changed that. However, even in the past comps such as L S D 2 and Shatter/God Comp could be horrifying to meet as Rogue.
Anyway, there is not a time in this game where warriors were considered bad. They have always been somewhere on top. You haven’t disproven that point.
I never said there was a point where they were considered bad - but there have been many times in the games history where they are 3rd or 4th best melee in 3s - and this all assumes that is all we’re talking about - 3s. If we include 2s and RBGs, warriors have been pretty mediocre most of the game’s lifespan when compared to classes like rogue mage and warlock.
If you think 3rd or 4th best melee = OP, thats on you. Personally being in A tier doesn’t mean you’re OP, and being in S tier with 3 or 4 other melee doesn’t mean you’re OP either.
“If everyone is OP, no one is”
S is basically overtuned.
A is strong.
B is “good”.
C and under is just underperforming.
That is my understanding of tiers. Can be wrong.
1 Like
“”“S”“” is not a real tier, stop using it, it undermines the purpose of making tier lists