I am doing a full-throated Jani hek-hek-hek-hek rn
To Mito and the other cishets in the chat, even just saying “I don’t really get it but I respect their choices” is super helpful when it comes from cishets (especially men).
I remember from learning Russian at schools that it was always a funny experience as Russian itself has a third grammar gender, which translated into Estonian was basically ‘intersex’ or something. Obviously, for a bunch of kids in the early 2010s meant a lot of cringe humour.
The problem with this is that you don’t need to do anything to give them ammunition, they’ll just find it on their own. You can’t hold yourself to an impossible standard to appease the phobes, because they’ll be phobes in the end anyway. Very often, they even literally just lie and say you’ve done this lie if they can’t find anything from what you’ve done.
Unfortunately, the ignorant masses will always be more easily swayed by the phobes due to how social media and the news favour outrage machines and ‘look at these crazy people’ things bring in the clicks. It’s so much harder to disprove misinformation. In my opinion, the best solution really is simple - more representation. If what the ignorant masses see on the TV as a neutral ‘it/its’ character, they might not as easily fall into a pundit making fun of ‘these crazy people’.
Also a lot of it is what Lintian said too - people on the streets seeing that we’re all still just people. Of course, that in of itself can be dangerous, especially with how polarized the current social culture has become especially with trans people in mind. You would think it’d swing the other way now, and people would make fun of ‘these crazy people watching who goes into which bathroom just to assault anyone who doesn’t pass to some ridiculous standard’… but alas.
Neopronouns in my (very limited and only online observant) experience has been that it’s somewhat less serious than real persons wrt someone’s identity and moreso to do with it being part of a movement making fun of gendered pronouns altogether.
praise guthix
Yeah, just ask Neville Chamberlain how appeasement went for him in the 1930s.
pretty well i think right? i remember him getting off the plane and celebrating the success
i stopped reading the history book after that because i figured it was a done deal and the rest would be just fluff. he said we had peace in our time after all
sorry, in the post-credits there’s a marvel style scene of hitler laughing evilly in his office while reading about it in the newspaper
I mean it gave Britain more time to rearm so that’s pretty good I think
I’m actually a Chamberlain apologist but the nuance wouldn’t work for my meme
the eternal struggle of doing what you think is right or doing what you think will be a funny stunt
Alright but now the real question, as what Age of Empires 2 Civ do you identify?
chamberlain getting a better treatment these days than he used to. historians love dunking on people with the benefit of hindsight because they’re ultra nerds and need to read less books and spend more time on the argent dawn forums where the real history is being made
Burgundians, Italians, or Sicilians, depending on my mood
Aztecs.
I’m sorry, but I can’t forgive such heinous mishaps as willingly letting yourself be called neville
But who is better, Pitt the elder or Lord Palmerston?
Wasn’t that the ending to the first Kingsman movie
yeah nah sorry you went too deep now. like i said i only read the first chapter of history and then got bored
pitt the elder is an absolutely brilliant name though so he wins the vibe check
Pitlord Palmerston