I too always liked the alliance city’s. I’m just to big of a forsaken fan.
I always thought both factions are morally gray. Both had there good and bad side. And yes I too think there is a good portion of horde players that play the horde cause they think thats the “evil” faction.
I see that especially with forsaken many people think the undead must be evil and while the forsaken absolutely have pretty evil guys I’m there ranks there are also many that just want to live there second live and only fight cause they need.
That once was even there main story drive until blizz decidet to give sylvanas a motivation to pursue war and death to feed the jailer
The Horde believes the Alliance is a murderer, and the Alliance believes the Horde is a murderer. Of course, there is always another person who is regarded as the other murderer by both.
No, I don’t agree. First; with this particular analogy, ‘murderer’ is too strong a term.
I think a better analogy would be looking at Murica. Alliance and Horde are basically Democrats and Republicans. Both largely want the same thing, but their ideology and methods differ.
Can’t be a truce really. It was a one sided victory condition where the alliance is holding all the cards and the Horde will end up fractured no mattered who writes it down.
You have been told countless of times by many different people that your view on that whole thing is unrealistic and incredibly skewed by your bias. Give it up.
You already took the first step by going Alliance. Now you need to learn to let go of your old delusions.
Because you are not gaining anything from clinging onto them.
There is only one thing I am a tiny bit mad about and that is jaina coming out of that raid.
All horde chars either die when they become raid bosses or in garrosh case die next expac or get banished to literal hell.
But I have to admit that’s partially cause I don’t like her in general
No. You can’t.
And that’s enough indulging you for now.
I have no strong feelings one way or another.
I don’t care about alliance characters dying if it serves a narrative.
The thing is: Blizzard can’t just keep doing that because we’ll be left solely with a new host of characters that we don’t know (or hardly know) and thus have no connection with.
Look at the characters that were killed: The vast majority of them were B characters at best.
The ones that did matter were handled with a lot of care and attention or were spared.
I agree that it has to serve the narrative but it kinda feels like they don’t know how to make a narrative where the death of an major alliance character serves it.
Tyrande was set up pretty well as overwhelmed by her hate so much that she took these crazy power from Elune. That would have been a good opportunity for a alliance death that would have served the war story.
Jaina would have been a good fit for the whole battle of dazalor story since as it stands right now the alliance walked into the troll capital that was enhanced by the horde and managed to kill the king and come out without any major losses. The only narrative that got served by that is that the horde is pretty helpless should the alliance ever diced to eradicat us
It’s mostly a different team in place now. Most of the people responsible for those decisions are gone. We’ll see where this saga goes.
Metzen did say that they want to be careful with who they kill; because gone is gone.
But that we will see some deaths before the end of the Worldsoul Saga.
Anyway: To bring it back to this thread’s topic… I don’t think we’ll see horde/alliance warfare in this saga. The focus is clearly somewhere else. After that ends; who knows.
