Separate cheaper sub for classic

They are as good as your comprehension skills, I never say completely free, I say free with the subscription. As in you do not pay extra.

I believe the actual phrase is Value added items.

Edit: It’s like those Vacuums you see on JML, you buy the vacuum and they send you the tools for free, they won’t just send you the tools alone for nothing, you need to buy the vacuum.

I guess you just reacted to one post I made instead of doing the proper thing and reading the whole thread.

Bad attempt to mask the swearing though.

And there goes the green costume you want out of the window.

I never took up the green costume, even when it was offered some years ago.

You have some serious mental issues, or extremely bad brain damage.

Fix your attitude.

1 Like

Says the guy in 50 euro retail transmog.

Considering we getting less support and mtc are implemented, its not really cheap.

1 Like

I personally think you could come up with the best arguements but they wont ever so this. Sadly for some

Hilarious.

1 Like

Oh no.
I can already hear the “Classic Andy’s” (to put it in their terms) flaming that Classic is more popular then Retail blabla.

This was asked for before classic was released for a multitude of reasons.

It, for example, would allow for classic to have a budget for itself that is payed for by its customers. Instead of players like you and me paying for the next store mount on retail.

But Blizzard doesnt want it that way. They never saw classic as anything else but a nostalgia quick money grab. They invested in how to transfer the most people off of classic towards retail, as they can monetize it way…waaaay better.

All we can do is to never even install the retail client an hope that it gets tracked by some statistics.

A classic only sub is and was the best decision for classic all along.

Maybe Blizzard will reconsider one day.

1 Like

Hahaha a lmao op imagine thinking that any comoany would give up money so naive

Give up? LOL. By charging separately they’d be getting more money. Sub from retail and sub from classic. Hell, they’d even make a combined subscription which would cost more than the current one.

Yeah no they know that almost nobody would pay both its not like blizz doesnt know how to monetise but oh well 2 digit iq

If Classic was to “hold its own”, as in not being produced by the money Blizzard get from expansion-sales, retail subs and the in-game store, Classic would have ended a long time ago.

I dont know what dream world people are living in, we are playing a game full of glitches and buggs that were reported this summer and here people claim “Classic needs no work”. If anything Id pay MORE (if it exclusively went to Classic) to get a better product, as clearly it DOES need work.

People must have forgotten how barren Classic was after last years summer.

nice to meet you : greatness

Try figuring out how much you play per hour playtime, and think over if it’s worth your money or not.

Stop answering, Keya is right and you are wrong.
Paying the same amount for an old game is ridiculous, i already explained it for Classic.

1 Like

This topic is new and interessting.

Exactly this, this would allow more transparency. We have 0 idea of how much of our Sub money actually goes to classic. But honestly i think this will never happen.

You are again forgetting the money that blizzard is making trough the boosts and transfers. Which is most certainly much more than it was back then.

I’m pretty sure many people would pay for both.

This happens, and its very common. Not with books since they don’t loose value and they have a cost to manufacture. But all digital games, music, multimedia overall gets way cheaper the older it gets. You might have one exclusion, which is Nintendo stuff as they keep the same value for years and years. But besides from that, just go check Steam for old but awesome games, and compare their prices on release, to current prices. I keep buying awesome games at Discounted prices just because they are 2-3 years old.

1 Like