Honestly. My main takeaways from Kingdom Come was just like, how poorly put together and unfinished it feels.
Henry is excessively boring, but I do understand why you play from a male character’s perspective where the story is concerned. As a woman, it’s not so much a case of ‘not being able to fight’ so much as it is I’d have spent half the game being locked up, having my things confiscated or married off to some noble or peasant against my will.
Not all the female characters were weak willed either, tbh, but saying that, majority of characters in the game suffer from weak characterization. That being said, what is and what isn’t ‘weak willed’ often seems to be a point of contention.
I remember the miller’s daughter being quite confident, outgoing, determined, etc, even if her lot in life was as a miller’s daughter. Even the women at the bath houses have very clear rules on what is and what isn’t acceptable, and they will outright refuse service if you act like a douche-monkey.
Where historical ‘accuracy’ is concerned, I can’t really comment.
It’s not a weird hate fetish manifesto of a game, regardless, imo. I think it’s a pretty flawed and mediocre unfinished title but ‘fetishistic hate manifesto’ is pushing it a bit, lol. Not everything someone creates has to be 100% representative of what they personally might think/believe.
Having such extreme reviews about titles you haven’t even played is kind of why people don’t take Anita Sarkeesian remotely seriously. Like. Where GG is concerned, I don’t really believe in censorship or silencing people, or bullying them, or using death threats to coerce - or any of the heinous things that happened during it - but speaking critically, Sarkeesian’s views are ‘usually’ poorly formed garbage based on things she’s never even sat down and played.