Testing Same-Faction Battlegrounds in Burning Crusade Classic

Ow boy! I played a Gnome mage, Gnome warrior, NE Hunter and Human War in Vanilla and TBC! What a nice story man!

Just because your faction is garbage and stays in the city doing PvE all day doesnt mean that Dad who has a 9 till 5 job and gets online at 19:30 can play 1 BG just because he plays horde…
You have no idea what you are talking about…
Not every one is like who and can play WoW all day… some people have a normal life and can play wow max 2-3 hours a day if they are lucky… wauw Dad can play 1 BG if he is lucky…
selfish piece of …

5 Likes

He is so right.
And if this people dont play pvp, every other bg or arena player wil have a harder time…

Vote 4 more casuals in bg and arena
Vote 4 same faction bgs

this is true. if que times aren’t fixed one way or another the only people left to play pvp are the most sweaty gamers. more casual people will have no chance competing there and will stop playing quite fast

The faction population is a proof to my words

Yes 60/40 is such a huge difference :slight_smile:

60/40 used to be in classic

and … how stupid is the conflict horde - alliance argument…

The only time you had a real conflict feeling was in vanilla before cross realm bgs .
In a cross realm bg you play against people, whom names you cant read or spell nor remember anyone .

Only in a realm based environment (with small population) you will have a conflict alliance - horde with long time memorys.
In this times the alliance on our Vanilla server had to wait up to 5hours for one BG and Alterac only happened, if a horde player put effort in LFG and start a group…

Same faction bgs is like cross realm bgs a necessary progress .

vote 4 same faction bgs
vote 4 dual spec

some changes are needed

2 Likes

If it was 60/40 horde wouldn’t have 2 hour queues

perhaps, i dont know.
I cant understand this, because nearly all the top tier pve guilds were alliance in classic.
but thats is just a small amount of players, of course.

If you are right, its not the solution to make it hard for horde casual pvp players…

If there is a hard disbalance of racials, blizzard has to change something after the results of p1 and season 1.
But now at the start of tbc, its time to observe the racials and the results first

thats too easy

the queue times will get longer and longer, when all the pvp interested alliance players have their honor gear.

queue times does not have to be a result of a big disporportion…

You forget that most of classic players are meta players. They used to play alliance in classic only because of paladins

Man you must be really dumb for making that comment…
The Alliance faction does not care about PvP hardly any Alliance leaves the city or participated in PvP content…
So no your comment makes 0 sence… if you guys dont play PvP we dont get alliance to queue up against… is that so hard to understand?

1 Like

Nice statistics!

Why alliance should? They have instant bg procs. And in open world there are 3 hordes for 1 ally, corpserunning is not pvp

Either you stupid or just a kid

So, can we please know if blizz is going to carry on with the HvH bgs or not ?

They will drag this out for weeks. They probably realised they screwed up and have backed themselves into a corner with OG warcraft players on one side and retailers on the other.

HI!
My fried Forti and i love to play BGs. :slight_smile:
So pls carry on with HvH BGs. Otherwise we weill be sad. :frowning:

Yes you are indeed