I used to affectionately call coworkers who are 4-5 years younger than me “kids” (i’m 29 now).
1 Like
+1
This totally wrong 2:30:
24 July 2010
But this is totally alright:
0:15 to 0:17
3 August 2018
Blizzard approved.
Cheers.
3 Likes
Judging from US television this statment actually makes sense.
2 Likes
The amount of outrage in these forums about such a small thing is also “unneeded”.
The fact that it is new or has been there for 9 years has nothing to do with it.
War in itself is not as much of a problem (WW2 games are usually 12+) but more extreme war/violence themes usually call for a higher rating (modern CoD games are 16+).
I already pointed in my opinion the game should be 16+. But I still think people are looking for stuff to be offended by when making the line change such a big deal.
As people have pointed out, they are being absolutely hypocritical. Not to mention what Sylvanas calls Arthas in TFT.
4 Likes
It would be pretty interesting if the kid was below T rating and their complaint got a T rating thing changed.
1 Like
Still they can remove it if they want to.
I stand by my point.
"Killing everything and mass-murdering with my kid is ok, some B word no… " - i would be worried about this parenting logic…
4 Likes
I honestly don’t care, so one of their kids said it’s out of place, so what? People are making a big deal out of it because it’s “iconic” when it is not really the case.
They didn’t make it a big deal, they just changed it. Players are the ones who made it a big deal.
1 Like
Yes, because it’s perfectly fine seeing things altered because other’s got offended by it right ?
In your opinion the game should change because Blizzard cares about other people’s opinion right ?
See the double standards ?
Cheers.
1 Like
People flock to the stupidest issues. The removal of that word from the game is such a non-issue and I’m shocked how much effort was poured into discussing it.
1 Like
12 y/o’s without supervision should 100% not be playing online games anyway imo.
I don’t know why you’re so stuck on it being a 9 year old quest. It can be a 50 year old quest as far as I care, if they want to change it so be it.
Care to elaborate how this actually offends/bothers you? Is it because the game is slightly less edgy now?
If you mention what she says on the forum you get the post removed btw. 
I am shocked seeing how many people defend this double standards attitude.
Wrong door my dear.
If we are going to censor a word because Garrosh was mean to Sylvanas, I want all her actions during BFA erased.
- Give the Night Elves their civilians and home back.
- Give the Forsaken their city and leader back.
- Return Saurfang, back to life.
- Erase this cursed expansion and make it a nightmare that you woke from.
Cheers.
2 Likes
This thread was also “unneeded” since there are already enough ones about this topic.
1 Like
- That wasn’t the point, you keep saying 9 years old like it’s a relevant matter but when I confront you about it you’re ignoring it and simply moving the goalposts.
- I never said you shouldn’t question it, I don’t see what’s so bad about them removing that word.
1 Like
If he’s responsible for the story in BfA, he deserves to be fired immediately.
4 Likes
Because it is relevant.
It’s not like the word has changed its meaning over time. It was used as an insult 9 years ago, continued to be used as an insult for 9 years, and it’s still used as an insult today
For 9 years there was no issue, no complaint, yet for some reason now, and only now, have they decided that actually it’s an offensive word and should be removed
3 Likes