"TheRe iS nO sUcH tHihg aS a CLASSIC PLUS dEfiNitioN"

WoW Classic WoW Classic General Discussion
1

People who keep saying “there is no definition of classic+” are delusional, and just deaf to the community. There’s no definition, oh really? :laughing:

Of course there is.

Just read the forums and fansites, listen some streams and videos, OMG.

1- Frozen 60 max level. (SoD may respect this in the end.)

2- Classic Lore + Classic-fitting unpublished lore. (pursuing unfinished questlines, introducing some pieces of the RPG…)

3- Unpublished zones (Hyjal, Azshara crater, Blackened Woods, Silvermoon, Sunwell Grove…)

4- Polish unfinished specs and gameplay (Balance Druid, Tanking Enh Shaman, Tanking Paladin, Ret Paladin…)

These are simple, core features of Classic Plus.

Prove me wrong please!

Also you’ll frequently have some features that are not “core” but often asked:
5- New Races (High Elves, Goblins, Ogres. I’d add Furbolgs maybe.)
6- New class (I don’t think we need any, except from Monk maybe, if we can’t get it derived from Priest with a Runesmith)
7- New combinations like Human Hunter - in general with the hard limit of Shaman staying Horde-exclusive and Paladin Alliance-exclusive.

Adding news specs through the Runesmith system is fine, and a good experience to work from.
I guess SoD will reach Classic+, as it manages point (4) and maybe point (1), as Karazhan preview lets hope for points (3, 2).

But it is by no means Classic+ in itself currently, as Classic+ mustn’t be seasonal.
Will our characters be destroyed after SoD shuts down?

2 Likes
2

Easy. That is your opinion of a Classic+ definition.

I have other things I would call Classic+, such as working summoning stones, vellums (not from the inscription profession though), minor class balances (taunt for paladin for example) and a better implementation of the entire PvP system - maybe even a new battleground (Azshara?)

And I guess if you ask another 10 people they also have different ideas of Classic+. So no, there is no common definition of Classic+.

I blatently refuse to listening to streamers. They all have the bad habbit of explaining the most simple thing in a 3 hour video (which have nothing to do with them earning more money for the viewing time, right?).

7 Likes
3

Classic+ is an aberration that should not exist.

3 Likes
4

Summoning stones have always worked tho?

5

Do you ever do anything else except troll and harass people who’re just having fun? Go away.

2 Likes
6

“Summoning” stones in original vanilla were basically a looking for group system (you could register at a “summoning” stone saying you’re interested in going into the dungeon, then go off and do quests, while others who go to the summoning stone can see your listing)
The actual summoning part only came with TBC

1 Like
7

Vanilla stones are named “Meeting stones”. In TBC “Summoning stones” came out and always worked after that so far I know.

8

Why? I am stating my opinion and I will not go away just because it differs from yours.

1 Like
9

You’ve done nothing but harass HC players on the forums ever since official HC came out, calling them names for playing a game mode you don’t like, now you’re here crapping on another Classic variation because you just can’t stop yourself from being an awful human being.

5 Likes
10

woah here they are, dottie i thought you ran away after it was announced becasue you bet gold it wouldnt…and lost.

5 Likes
11

dont worry about dottie, they said SOM1 wouldnt happen, they said hardcore wouldnt happen, they said classic + wouldnt happen,

sometimes in life you come across individuals that cant comprehend anything outside their imagination.

7 Likes
12

Summoning stones was introduced in TBC.
In Classic we have Meeting stones.

1 Like
13

Yes, just like I already said. But you wanted working summoning stones and those have always worked tho no?

14

There are no summoning stones in Classic, and therefore no working ones either. Read what I wrote :slight_smile:

1 Like
15

No sheit sherlock. There arent any broken onces eaither. :thinking:

16

I simply don’t understand your question. Are you just trolling big time here?

1 Like
17

You simply stated what I already said in the discussion if you read it.

18

You do know I play HC, right?

I never call them names and all I said here was I was against Classic+ not against the people who wanted it.

No, because I am right about this not being Classic+, It’s SoD which is SoM+ not Classic+

19

Getting serious “angry teenage girl” vibes from this. Gonna change the world with your forum posts little girl? You go!

Are all opinions what c+ should be.
Classic+ literally doesn’t exist and blizzard has said nothing about what classic+ is or should be.

The only true definition of classic+ would be: an altered version of vanilla wow with potentially extra and/or changed content, with content meaning raids/dungs/leveling/class or spec changes.

Who cares a bunch of streamers yell x or y.

But I’ll play your game because I perfectly know what the popular kiddy streamers have been yelling since you guys love to parrot them.

  • changes to classes: SoD check
  • kara crypts: SoD check
  • SM raid: SoD check
  • extra content at max lvl: SoD check

Show me where that is written by blizzard? Oh that’s right, I forgot you speak for the entire classic community, my bad bruh /s

2 Likes
20

Watch the announcement, set to 0.5x speed if you have to, read the interview, rethink what was said and come back again.

what I want is working balance druid, tanking shamans, working paladin specs
what I don’t want is working balance druid, tanking shamans, working paladin specs

1 Like