It’s been over for half this thread.
“Tell me where i said that u need a certain comp to manage it” was never close to the argument, which is fine for me since everyone else can read what you’re saying too.
You uncontextualised a quote in ur own words missing out the topic to take that
Wasn’t my own words, I left your bad spelling.
And it’s not uncontextualized because it’s a quote from this thread.
Heres the actual quote ur refrrring to
That’s fine because it’s in the thread and I took a part of it rather than the whole post because A)you asked me to B) it’s already available to read
Because i stated
The whole any any 5 players providing they fill the roles works is the reason for bad class design.
Not that they couldnt do it.
Im stsying comps SHOULD be required by content
Yes, which you said happened after WOTLK.
I still never stated content wasnt doable by any comp.
I said it should never have been doable by any 5 classes.
What?
Tell that to any melee in TBCC would you?
You did. You said that after WOTLK, group comp became non-important for completing content which obviously means you thought it was important in WOTLK.
You’ve spent a lot of time backtracking, it’s no wonder you don’t remember what you’ve said.
1 Like
No i quoted what i wrote.
I stated the fact any group of 5 players csn do content. Is why class design is bad.
Do you understand that you’ve made a lot of posts and some of the posts came later than when the argument began?
This is one of the reasons people don’t want it added, it’s not a very good sell to say that. But still, it does need to be included in WOTLK Classic when it’s supposed to, despite that.
That post is the exact post ur quote came from lpl
? Your quote says you need a certain composition to beat the dungeon in the first line
green geared pleb who doesn’t know how to press button lfg with full t6.
Oh why they not invite me?
U TOXIC!
We need RDF now bcs toxic players make game not fun for me.
2 Likes
No i said its a group leaders job to create a group comp to progress the said dungeon.
I.e create 1 tank 1 healer and 3 dps to do a dungeon. That is a group composition. I was describing a group leaders role, to organise a group for said content. I did not state its mandatory he rejects you for a hunter because ur class isnt fit to manage a dungeon. But the group composition is solely uptoo tje group leader. Its his responsibility.
Then stated the options arent play badly or be elitist. But playing badly doesnt state we are “u cant do it”. Anytging below the best u can achieve is playing badly
I.e
If you play the game without using a mount even tho u can use one.
The game is still doable, it isnt impossible. But you are playing badly, u are not utilising what u have access to therefore intentionally not achieving tje best you could manage.
Then went into a rant regarding i think the fact blizzard balance the game so a group of any 5 players is bad design for classes.
By your accusation my rant in the second half would completely contradict my first half statement as my rant stated that i think the fact comps arent stricter and content is balanced to allow a group of any 5 classes to manage content is bad.
I.e aknowledging a group of any 5 classes can do the content.
That’s an interesting choice of sarcasm since you’re intentionally making yourself look like a loser.
so that they can progress
aww the salty tears I can taste them from here, u noobs.
3 Likes
I get it, you’re not good at the game.