We dont want RDF

For every rdf troll that post, there will be one anti rdf post. Considering blizzard listens to whiny customers, this is needed. They never learned that unhappy customers are the loudest.

12 Likes

Well, its as you said. For every pro, there will be anti.

So consider this the pro to your anti (or the anti to your anti?).

We want RDF:D
(or at the very best, fix this hc+ situation that is destroying regular heroics)

31 Likes

We do but thank you.

Exactly !
Anti-RDF cried so much that they removed it.

Thank you again :wink:

6 Likes

Its time to add rdf, you can do it blizzard

21 Likes

There are no RDF troll posts, there are only anti-RDF troll posts. :wink:

8 Likes

Nah, heā€™s just writing English as a direct translation of his local language, including syntax and idioms. As a linguist, I can tell many of his posts would sound MUCH more coherent if they were in a different language.

That being said, this game needs RDF more than ever. Even on a full realm like Earthshaker, you need to spam trade chat incessantly to form any group other tham daily hc+ and pre-70 dungeons are broadly impossible.

5 Likes

Letā€™s see if they listen to this whiny and loud customer :slight_smile:

2 Likes

If you feel the only way to win arguments it turning to bullying you are doing good mister

3 Likes

They ā€œlistenā€ to sub numbers, nothing else.

I donā€™t see the connection here, are you blaming a movement on a singular person?

2 Likes

Asking for the ability to one-shot previous expansion raid bosses is stupid regardless of oneā€™s mother tongue.

No, Iā€™m correcting the person that just said the pro-RDF side has no trolls.

Perhaps I should instead ignore all of my opposition and then claim that thereā€™s no arguments against me? Now I wonder which chimp does thatā€¦

No itā€™s not stupid. You just disagree with it. It would allow classes that arenā€™t good at soloing to farm for old mount drops, gear sets, enchants and the like. As it is right now, only some classes can, others canā€™t. I can farm ZG for tiger, but not raptor for example. Some classes can solo MGT for a chicken, others canā€™t. Equalizing the playing field for the ā€œobsoleteā€ content is a possible solution. It is a perfectly reasonable thing to propose, you just donā€™t like it because you made a point to insult the guy childishly in every one of your replies to him.
At this point, Iā€™d venture a guess that more people cringe at your replies than at him.

2 Likes

Since Brian is gone and it took 1 week to buff rets by a dev who mains paladin, we will prob have RDF in 1 month. I cant believe blizz listens to wotlk pserver community.

Attack a persons arguments/opinions, not his person.

2 Likes

Corrected to: I find stupid.

1 Like

Corrected: Wich person does thatā€¦

As people by now probably know by now: Iā€™m all for RDF.

Itā€™s good to see thereā€™s opposition to RDF, I like hearing valid arguments. But some people tend to speak with ā€˜weā€™ pronouns and I personally donā€™t like that. Youā€™re not speaking on my behalf.

Other people like presenting opinions as facts. Itā€™s not that something IS stupid, itā€™s something you find stupid/annoying or w/e.

TL;DR: please keep trying to convince me, but do so with valid arguments or make it clear it is your opinion.

3 Likes

Youā€™re probably aware, but when you correct other peopleā€™s grammar it just negates your own point.

Itā€™s cringe and completely pointless in a discussion.

1 Like

Iā€™m not correcting grammar tho. I make plenty of mistakes in my own cause Iā€™m not a native speaker. So Iā€™m well aware.

It doesnā€™t negate my point, cause the point Iā€™m trying to make is that we should try change eachothers mind in a respectable manner instead of presenting opinion as fact (Eg. saying something IS cringe instead of you find something cringe) or calling names (Eg. calling someone a chimp).

Back to the topic at handā€¦

I feel by reading the forums thereā€™s more people for RDF, than against. Change my mind.

1 Like

And there you go again, well done.

1 Like

He doesnā€™t have an argument. ā€œI want RDFā€ is a statement; not an argument.

Editted right back to is stupid. Blanket statement.

You donā€™t spend much time on the forums, do you?

Little lesson; you canā€™t change each others minds. If two people want two different things and each of which is drastically different and completely contradicts the others then there is no middle ground.

Of course there is. The forums are generally used as a place for people to voice their frustrations. Naturally youā€™re going to find more people here that are pro-RDF because their voicing their frustration at aspects of the game that RDFcould fix.