That’s not the point of the thread, the point of the thread is to point out that not having RDF cause “it preserves the social aspect” is utterly stupid.
Cause it is. And it always was.
If the social aspects aren’t made worse by having RDF in the game, it’s wholeheartedly a gain for the game to have it in.
The acts you have to commit to be shunned on a server the size we presently have should probably get you banned from the game entirely. Servers are just too big for this to be an argument.
Social aspect is there. Everyone who say the opposite is simply lying . Just because few of his dungeons were like this does not mean anything and is not a reason to ruin the game with rdf
It’s your claim. I have never seen that. I have only seen pro-RDF people CLAIM that anti-RDF people say that.
Can you show me from any discussion made at any time where someone who is against RDF said that “no RDF improve the social” (doesn’t have to be that exact wording).
You have it all backwards. No one is saying that no RDF “improve” the socials aspect of the game. What we are saying is that RDF is harming it. That’s a big difference.