And like Garrosh, before controversy she had no problem calling for support. So I take it you finally take my point
Either that’s a load of rubbish or you are not a self respecting person…
No, headcannon would be thinking that just because you think someone deserves something it excuses actions taken entirely. That’s headcannon
We did, and as I recall we agreed that her being revealed was very damaging to any attempt at negotiations, so I am not real sure what you think this proves.
I doubt it. Alliance have had more characters revive from apparent death than killed. The Horde on the other hand… hah, well no revivals there outside of time traveling orcs
No you can’t. The quote this originally pertains to was when she said she and her first forsaken used to be loyal Alliance citizens (true) that they died for that banner (fighting the scourge, so also true) and their reward was to be hunted as vermin (look at the classic quest zones in that area, so also true). I then cited a pristine example of how Rogers and Genn explicitly state they are hunting her down.
ever since they you’ve just been saying she believes her words to be true but they are lies. How about you try proving something here. Until then, while I detest the word, surely this is the clearest example of “headcannon” of all time…
Yeah, well, maybe you shouldn’t make sure ridiculous statements then.
Hah, well let’s look at an example. Genn could have not run from the blight in the siege of Lordaeron, there were horde with masks on in it after all. Since he values self preservation he ran. Not really uncommon, in fact we should expect everyone has such thoughts. It’s probably not unfair to say for the Alliance, this is a war for survival. The Horde killed not only them but citizens. from Alliance PoV it’s definitely about the safety of their people as a primary reason.
Ergo the statement “No other major characters goal is to stay alive.” is absolute nonsense.
Listen to the Saurfang and Garrosh conversation in Borean Tundra.