Well, you understand that this will completely ruin the game for such people)))
“For the common good” to ruin the game for some in order to “improve” it for others, this is the height of cynicism. To be honest, I am not surprised by your position.
Every class is nerfed and then buffed after a while. You’re not suggesting making changes and then reversing them after a while, right? You’re suggesting ruining the game for people forever.
Ironically, this is the modus operandi for Qsyncers 
The truth is, the game is already ruined for so many, due to your Qsyncing.
I’m suggesting fixing balancing issues, waiting times, map imbalances, qsyncing abuse & player distribution …in one-move.
Blizzard has consistently made structural changes that some groups hated, but which supported the long-term health of the game.
Besides, cross-faction grouping already exists in multiple places, this would just be an extension of that, considering it’s been successful thus far.
The point is that you have a choice. What you offer leaves people no choice, and that is the fundamental difference.
I repeat, you are suggesting that someone fix something for one person, but break it for another. The fact that this fix is entirely in your favor and ignores the interests of others, we will consider it a mere coincidence.
This is why many players simply ignore this kind of content.
Keep repeating it. I’ll just keep flipping it.
What you’re doing (Qsync) ruins the game for everyone you play against.
You know you’re giving them a ~2% chance of winning (entirely in your favour) -& you do it anyway. Intentionally.
Infact, worse than that, you blame them, for not also exploiting the queue restrictions.
My suggestion is based around balance & fairness.
Your actions cause imbalance & unfairness.
Are you high?
In PvE, cross-faction grouping solved one of the biggest pain points: not being able to find enough players on your faction for Mythic+ or raids. Tanks and healers, already a scarce resource, became easier to find when you weren’t restricted to your faction’s supply.
Horde dominated high-end PvE and PvP participation, leaving Alliance struggling to find groups. Cross-faction largely fixed that problem. Players now have the freedom to choose their character/faction for aesthetic or lore reasons, without being punished by gameplay limitations.
Some people didn’t like cross-faction at first (“it ruins immersion”), but the upside for the majority of players was so strong (shorter queues, more groups, healthier balance) that it outweighed the complaints.
I mean, let’s compare all the complaints about Blitz being cross-faction with all the complaints about Qsyncing…
You go first.
You didn’t have to write so much useless text, just write.
At least it would be fair…
Understand, my young friend, I don’t care at all what happens to you, I don’t care at all what happens to those who like to play only for one faction.
It amazes me how a person who believes that he is being treated unfairly can support injustice towards others.
I don’t need to answer, I’ve lived long enough to see through people like you.
Is it that you question that none ever joines with friends in this game? Weird take on my question but you do you.
Oh come on, of course you care.
You wouldn’t spend all this time & energy replying & basing this whole argument around them if you didn’t care…
…would you!?
…not your problem either, since you don’t care. So why make a hullabaloo about it?
Perhaps it’s time to get those cataracts checked old boy.
Yeah, I don’t care.
All this was to understand your true motives and I understood them.
I might disappoint you, Voi, but your efforts are a waste of time, unfortunately for you.
…my ‘true motives’?
…all my efforts are a waste of time?
This all sounds a little cryptic.
’I know what you’re trying to do & it’s not going to work!”
There’s no hidden agenda. No scheme to unravel.
I actually mean what I say.
Kinda figured its quite easy to see when they actually a small group or if every other person that didnt get a spot just solo queued into it. Benefit: Larp as 5 man group within the rules no “syncing per se” and ride the moral high horse.
Quite clearly you won’t be winning this with a random team so my question would be how to actually dodge this? (apart from perma deserter)
In essence, this cannot be changed.
Blizzard has literally forced people to play in groups for years with its innovations. In-game communities, in-game voice chat, add-ons, guilds, friend lists and much more. What is all this for? To play solo? I don’t think so. People actively use all this and a significant part of people have become so accustomed to it that they do not see the point in playing differently, they will not play differently.
Go to any of the PvP communities and see… This is communication, fun, arguments, sometimes drama and tears. It is even more interesting in voice chat.
Now imagine that Blizzard suddenly breaks all this to make the game “fair”. And to do this, it is necessary to completely remove communication in the game between players, while it exists, people will play in groups. The game will become completely asocial.
These people do not write anything on the forums for obvious reasons - everything is fine with them. After such changes, hundreds of people will come to the forums to write about “super-changes”.
The thing is that Blizzard does not think like you, like me, or like a gnome who wants changes for himself - his beloved self and does not care about others.
They think more “on a large scale”. And to exchange one tear for another, while investing effort and resources, is, at the very least, madness.
Once I went to the US forum, someone created a topic about active unsubscribing of users in protest against the policy Blizzard is pursuing in relation to Epic BG.
I checked the first 5 people… No one unsubscribed, everyone continued to play as they were playing… But how many tears, how much playing for the public, just pathetic actors who are not responsible for their words.
And after all this they try to prove to me:
Remember the gnome who got scared when I found out his nickname in the game?
Do you know why he got scared? He recently actively played premades, but after disagreements with Larkus, he stopped playing with him and found nothing more interesting than writing on the forum about banning premades.
Moreover, he wrote about the ban on pre-mades, at the time when he actively participated in them.
Half of them are like that here.
I do hope you’re referring to me here, Sherlock.
Since I’ve never actively played with Larkus, people will know you as a liar and a Qsyncer. Gratz 
Assuming he has any integrity, Larkus will tell you himself when he’s around…
No, I didn’t mean you. I’m waiting for an apology.
So are all the players you’ve ruined games for.
Let’s go together on 3….
So you are not responsible for your words? Right?
You want to hide behind others’ backs, well, actually I wrote about this above and I am not surprised by your answer
I think for most people its not about playing solo but about fun. Onesided matches are not fun even if its you who is on the giving end.
I dodged the first days of the season start,for some farming which gave me more gold than bloodstones ever could, but as soon as i queued up i saw quite some new people hoping for some good matches/teamfights.
Ye apart from a few exceptions it was just stomping.
When i heard and also saw myself zni and shrk are queuing alliance i kinda thought most people are queuing alliance now to dodge them.
Which therefore also benefit my maps different people, doing as the leader(i just got handed the crown) said etc.
Polar opposite from what i experience normally.
Downside was onesided matches and another season with blabla about my non existing premade/sync premade.
I think we reached the point where it needs intervention starting with trading a bit of queuetime to make sure both teams have at least 3 healers. 0-2 healer maps are a joke i would even say 3 is too less but it should be the bare minimum.
It would not harm any comgroups but it would make the pug vs pug matches a bit fairer so people have at least a chance to get some conquest there if they have to serve as food for the coms x)
It would not really matter, every unsub from a dying breed out of the pvp bubble can be easily countered by a pve andy buying a token and boy they do.
they really dont. I agree.
i mean think about it. we have people in Eu forums that defends the premade vs random or newbie people
when blizzard see that we still have players that are sacrificing a whole pvp game for their own profit with defending the premades then what do you expect?
they will say look these people are defending a wrong thing in the game why should be bother puting time and money and effort to fix the game for these?
thats the reality.
one of their leaders that runs russian premade bgs day and night allways is here to defend it.
DID ANY OF YOU ASK YOURSELF WHY?
Because they are playing for their personal gain.
thats all there is to it
Yes, you are right, for some it is. But for some, playing in groups is fun.
Absolutely. But it shouldn’t be a policy of banning one in favor of the other. Blizzard has trapped themselves in that.
This is of colossal importance. People write about things that, in essence, have no meaning for them. They write just for the sake of writing. This forum is read by those people who are involved in this game and they see this circus, and the more they observe it, the more they are sure that, in fact, no changes are needed.