Pretty much what I tried to do as well. Have a civil talk about it and did I get constructive critisism? Taking your replies from my thread, let’s see:
Yes very constructive, don’t smell any sarcasm at all.
Yeah, what I said.
People have been accusing me for only being nice to those who only agreed with my topic and that I sit in some echo chamber, right. Far from the truth. Only takes a tiny bit in interest and energy to scroll through the posts and check.
Allow me to say, by making your own post about how pro boost you are, which Blizz will gladly stand behind, I fail to see how making your biased thread to be any better. So far I did not see a single one saying like “dude we did not need another same topic” and all that I got. So enjoy trying to chase your echo chamber.
- 58 boost was not in the old TBC back in 2007
- What’s stopping people from playing up any toons now if they are so keen on TBC?
- It will be quite faster once pre patch comes to level up. Atleast 30%.
- But no people want to sit with their arms crossed and wait for a boost?
- Boost is a pay2skip, period. Blizz saw a cash grab chance and went for it.
- Will make Blizz more money sure, but do we get anything from it, like them adding GM’s who can help us reporting the bots etc? Would only take GM a second to notice. Answer is (most likely) no.
- Those who did not play Classic at all so the only toon they will have is a poor lvl 58 without any gold, profession, profession alts and so on. And you really think they will have a good time coming into TBC when those who acually did put in time an effort into this, who got gold, profession alts and all that? This smells Retail mentality long way.
- The boost is maybe good and convenient for us who played Classic as we might wanna have another profession alt (cloth/transmute CD etc) or maybe even reroll their main but atleast we did put in the work before. The argument I mostly hear is “so the new players can play”.
- Well everything else is in my thread.
Lastly: So for someone who care about a game’s integrity and have concerns about it, how can that be a bad thing? I never namecalled anyone and left the insults and sarcasm out (until now for the first time to you), too bad the door did not swing both ways here.
Ahh thanks for the confirmation Majesty. Makes sence now and I feel kinda silly trying to make my point in some essay about these QoL features to him ^^
Edit: Typos. English is not my native language.