A lot of people have not even done TBC or really taken a deep dive in to TBC. Classic exists to avoid stuff (not very well some can argue) from retail like cash shops etc. Boosts are not necessary and it goes against the grain of what this game is suppose to be. Retail and others games exists to play if you do not like it. Sometimes admitting that you are lazy or could not care less is also good and valid.
I should add, I am not calling you lazy
And alot of peopele in that mentality⌠likely will never play TBC.
but by sheer popularity⌠TBC Was Played by a VAST amount more people then SL is currentyly. which means theres MORE TBC veterans then SL players.
no it exists to get money from nostalgia.
but neither are exactly true. it is possible to enjoy TBC but not classic. we are talking about re-experiencing old content. they dont need to gatekeep such or force vanilla on every player who wants to rexperience TBC.
I can see you are quite cynical. Obviously they gonna make money even more so now. Bobby loving all the ppl giving him even more money from the boosts. The point is the boost is antithetical to classic and should not be offered. If they want to re experience TBC they can take some time to level. There was a social contract in a ways that we do not want any influences from retail⌠especially paid services. But nobody will be able convince anyone here. Some would just like the light to be on a little bit longer.
Oh, iâm wrong. its paid so doesnât serve that purpose. I do have friends who donât have high level characters but if I want to play with them I can do early content rather than trying to take them to outland.
-
Donât like donât do is not an argument when the boost influences the whole environment.
-
While I agree that it is more an argument against bots than an argument against the token itself, the token does make botting much more lucrative.
-
I didnât get that one.
Go watch madseasonâs video, your point of view, arguments and counterarguments are very simplistic and shortsighted.
And your textwall can be summarized in âI donât want to put in effort, I want rewards now, anti-boosters donât want thatâ.
The character clone is something different but I presume youâve figured that out now
Letâs follow that logic, ok?
Why not level 70 then? As you said, it would be optional. You should not care how otherâs feel about this. You said it:
So if level 58 is fine, why not 70? Remember:
Or do the obligations in real life stop when you ding level 58? Because, you know:
And, of course:
Because
And I can end with:
So level 70 boost should be intruced to the game as well according to the logic that supports the level 58 boost, right?
See what I did there? I can do it again:
Why not another service to buy a profession to max level? Because, you said it:
BecauseâŚ
etc.
What about lifting the restriction of one char per account? Because:
etc.
Why not a service to buy the materials for the professions from the cash shop instead of having to farm them in game? Because, you know:
etc.
Why not another service to buy gear from the cash shop? Yes, you guessed it:
I can do that all day if you want. Can you get the point though?
Wasting an hour of my life watching something I wouldnât agree with is not something I would do.
And your points are invalidated by âitâs old contentâ, what rewards, apart from saving time, and anti boosters are mean.
Thatâs is the same strawmanning you are saying they have done. Blizzard only ever offers max level boosts in retail after the next expansion is available for pre-purchase, at the end of itâs life, which is what they are doing with the Classic boost.
I was answering to the OP , and in your case you already got your answers.
Basically the : âMy point of view > Allâ
Exactly, let retail things stay in retail.
I never said that, what I said was I wouldnât watch it as it wonât change my view, I know the points they have made in the video and they are nothing new.
They wonât, as Blizzard themselves have said, this is not a faithful recreation of TBC, itâs an improved recreation.
Let me quote myself if you donât mind:
Donât mine-quote one sentence and act as if you had answered to the point. That is not the actual point of the post.
I quoted the whole passage you wrote in-between the quotes you made, so if itâs not clear thatâs not my fault.
Well would have been without the boost.
You do know all the changes they have made? Even without the boost?
Yup and a lot of them were good and keeping in step with the spirit of the game.
So you are the person to define which changes are good and which are bad?
And yet, you did not anwer to the point of the post. You still havenât, BTW.