So nochanges is over and there is gonna be 58 boost added, character copy… Why no appearance change? I want to change the appearance of my 30 days played main and not pay 60 bucks to insta boost a new 58. Appearance change was added in early wotlk while character boosts were added in WoD or something so it doesnt make sense at all.
don’t worry, blizzard will surely add that at some point, they are just trying their best to milk money out of everyone xD
What about race/faction swap? do u think they will add it at start or end of xp like before?
yeah let’s add the wow token too sarcasm
I wouldnt draw a parallell between the unlimited character boost in Retail and a once per acount boost (that doesnt work on the new races) in TBC, especially not in an attempt to justify Barbershop.
When people argumented for a gold limit (which I disagree with) alot of them were talking about TBC beeing its own installment and how it was unfair for the players that “just came for TBC” (hence the need for fresh servers, yada yada) to be forced into Classic when TBC was their MO.
In my eyes, this one time boost is for those exact people who might have waited for TBC and now want to go straight into the action.
In actual tbc you still had to level 1-58 first before being able to enter outland. Makes no sense at all to add this boost feature for lazy people but than don’t add appearance change/barbershop for people who actually took the effort to level their characters but just want to alter the looks a bit.
I’m not a fan of the boost, but from a business point of view, I absolutely understand why they do it.
Lots of people will come back for TBC, but they have no interest in Vanilla.
If these people have to struggle for a month to get through 1-58, just to play the game they actually want to play, many of them will be gone again even before seeing Outland.
So you want Barbershop as a reward for leveling 1-58, unlike people who want to play their favourite expansion when it’s released and at its prime?
THAT makes sence to you instead? ^^ These arguments are getting dumber for each post.
I would put apperance change for 100 Euro, never bad to milk some money from people who wants it I will not use it but it will make TBC more profitable and not harming ingame economy in any way.
They’ll have to level from 58 to 70 too, you know ?
Basically they’ll do the same type of quests and it’s like 2 to 3 days of /played too.
So you say, I am really pissed and against boosting because it wasn’t in the game, but I would love to have appearance change that also wasn’t in the game. Instead of fighting against that, even if you most likely lose, you surrender to retardness, hence more people asking stupid things like that and they actually might happen. If they add it, make a post and ask LFR. Gratz
and that ladies and gentlemen is a well designed filter.
must be a nice era we’re living in if having your hair cut/changed in the virtual world cost more than in real life xD
I can’t say I disagree, I’d rather also avoid these “tourists” if possible.
But for Blizzard it’s clearly more profitable having these people play for 3 months in TBC, that having them give up after 3 weeks because they cba playing through Vanilla first.
yes, unfortunately this is the only fact that matters for blizzard
It would seem to me like people actually want to go straight to Wrath instead of experiencing TBC first. What a surprise.
Appearance change was added in WOTLK which is a ‘classic expansion’. Also it isn’t pay to win since it doesn’t make you skip days of played time unlike the boosts. It makes no sense at all to add a P2W service but not add other services that have way less impact.
How can you not see that the same thing that has been talked about millions and millions of times, that asking for changes brings more changes? And this is proven today by this retarded instant boost. Please stop this or we will get tokens and LFR, how can people not see this?
I TOLD you all this would happen.
Now you will see the continuous flood of people wanting retail changes and microtransactions.